שאלות ממליצים לתוכניות MBA שמתחילות ב-2025
הערות חשובות
עליך לבדוק את אתר בית הספר כדי לקבל את המידע העדכני והמדויק ביותר.
הממליצים צריכים למלא את טופס ההמלצה הרשמי של ביה"ס במערכת הממליצים, ולא להסתמך רק על המידע המוצג בעמוד זה.
לפעמים בתי ספר משנים את השאלות במהלך העונה, לכן חשוב שהממליצים שלך יוודאו שהם עונים על השאלות הנכונות לפני שהם מגישים את ההמלצה.
Instructions
We strongly prefer that MBA candidates provide both letters from current or former employers. If you do not provide a letter from your current direct supervisor, you should include an explanation in the Supplementary Data section of the online application.
Please only submit two letters of recommendation. Recommendations may be submitted online or through the mail using a PDF version. You will receive an automated message once a recommender has submitted their letter of recommendation. Letters sent via mail must have the letter writer’s signature across the seal of the envelope.
If your recommender is not comfortable writing a letter in English, it is acceptable to obtain the recommendation in the native language of the author. The original letter and an English translation completed by an ATA (American Translators Association) certified translator must be provided through the mail with the letter writer’s signature across the seal of the envelope.
You are responsible for ensuring that the recommendation is submitted prior to the application deadline. Please do not draft or write your own letter of recommendation, even if asked to do so by your recommender. This can result in denial of your application or withdrawal of your offer of admission.
QUESTIONS
Section 1: Recommender Information
Thank you for agreeing to write a recommendation for the applicant for admissions to the Haas Full-time MBA Program at the Haas School of Business. We encourage you to be completely candid and to provide specific examples whenever possible. It is helpful to the applicant if you answer the specific questions that we ask. Generic recommendations that do not address our questions typically do not strengthen an application. We greatly appreciate the time and effort that you are taking to provide us with your assessment of the applicant's abilities.
- First Name
- Last Name
- Organization
- Work Location (Country)
- Position/Title
- Relationship
- Industry
- Telephone
- Email Address
Section 2: Leadership Assessment Grid
In this section, you will find 12 competencies and character traits that contribute to successful leadership. The competencies and character traits are grouped into five categories: – Achievement – Influence – People – Personal Qualities – Cognitive Abilities For each competency, please select the one button that corresponds to the behavior that you have seen the applicant most consistently exhibit. We acknowledge that all applicants have both areas of strength and areas of needed development. Your candid and honest appraisal will assist in evaluation of the applicant. Please assume that each level builds upon behaviors described in the previous level.
ACHIEVEMENT
Initiative
Acts ahead of need/ anticipates problems
Results Orientation
Focuses on and drives toward delivering on goals, objectives, and performance improvement
INFLUENCE
Communication, Professional Impression & Poise
Delivers messages and ideas in a way that engages an audience and achieves buy-in; uses listening and other attending behaviors to reach shared understanding; remains calm and measured even in time of crisis or conflict.
Influence and Collaboration
Engages and works with people over whom he/she has no direct control
PEOPLE
Respect for Others
Acknowledges the value of others’ views and actions
Team Leadership
Manages and empowers a team of direct reports or peers on project based teams (includes virtual teams)
Developing Others
Helps people develop their performance and ability over time
PERSONAL QUALITIES
Trustworthiness/Integrity
Acts consistently in line with or follows explicit values, beliefs or intentions
Adaptability/Resilience
Adapts to changing demands and circumstances without difficulty. Maintains calm optimism in the face of challenge, problems, or apparent failure
Self-Awareness
Aware of and seeks out additional input on own strengths and weaknesses
COGNITIVE ABILITIES
Strategic Orientation
Thinks beyond one’s span of control and into the future to reshape the approach or scope of work
Problem Solving
Frames problems, analyzes situations, identifies key issues, conducts analysis on the issues, and produces acceptable solution
Is there anything about your ratings on which you would like to comment? (Optional) (textbox)
Based on your professional experience, how do you rate this applicant compared to her/ his peer group? (select)
Overall, I… (select)
SECTION 3. RECOMMENDATION QUESTIONS
1. Please provide a brief description of your interaction with the applicant and, if applicable, the applicant’s role in your organization. (Up to 50 words) (textbox)
2. How does the performance of the applicant compare to that of other well-qualified individuals in similar roles? (E.g. what are the applicant’s principal strengths?) (Up to 500 words) (textbox)
3. Describe the most important piece of constructive feedback you have given the applicant. Please detail the circumstances and the applicant’s response. (Up to 500 words) (textbox)
4. Is there anything else we should know? (Optional) (textbox)
We strongly prefer that you use this form for your recommendation. Alternatively, you may upload a letter of recommendation. (upload file)
INSTRUCTIONS
You will need one reference from a supervisor. We do not accept academic references or those from relatives, peers, or colleagues. The reference must come from someone who has worked with you in a supervisory or managerial role.
Choose your referee and get them started early so your application is not held up by late reference submission.
Your referee will receive an automatic reference request once you have entered their contact details on our online application system.
You are required to provide one reference. This reference should come from a line manager or a supervisor.
If you are an entrepreneur, own your own business or work for a family business, you can select a supplier or client.
QUESTIONS
Contact information
- First name
- Surname
- Job title
- Organisation
- Phone
- Address line 1
- Street address
- Address line 2
- Street address
- City
- Post code
- Country
- Length of time you have known the applicant?
- In what capacity have you known the applicant?
Rate the applicant
Please use the table below to appraise the applicant in the context of her or his peer group.
What is the peer group that you are using? __________________
Number in peer group ___________________
Applicant's ranking within peer group _____________________
For each skill below, Select: below average ; average ; good ; outstanding ; exceptional ; insufficient information
- Integrity
- Ability to work with others
- Creativity
- Motivation
- Self-confidence
- Analytical skills
- Written communication skills
- Oral communication skills
- Leadership potential
- Responsibility for own action
- Quantitative numerical skill
Reference letter
Please provide us with a one-two page letter of reference for the candidate.
Please include the following in your reference letter:
- Date
- Your job title
- Your organisation
- Your name
- Your signature (can be electronic/typed/scanned)
- Please tell us anything that you think will help the Admissions Committee evaluate the candidate's application, but in particular we would like you to address the following issues:
Reference criteria
The applicant has identified you as the following reference type: Supervisor
Please complete the following if you are a Supervisor or Peer Referee
1. Elaborate and / or provide us with concrete examples if you have rated the applicant as below average, outstanding or exceptional on any of the qualities in the 'Rate the Applicant' Section.
2. Describe what you like most and least about working with the applicant.
3. Tell us about any particular weakness the candidate has compared to other peers / team members that you regularly work with.
4. Describe the applicant’s attitude and behaviour when working with: (a) managers/supervisors (b) peers (c) subordinates.
5. Suggest what you think the applicant will be doing in ten years.
Please upload your reference letter here:
INSTRUCTIONS
We require just one recommendation and ask you to select someone with whom you have a professional relationship. Ideally, you would pick a supervisor (current or previous), but someone who can speak to your strengths at work would be best.
We use the GMAC Common Letter of Recommendation (LOR). The Common LOR is intended to save you and your recommender valuable time by providing a single set of recommendation questions for each participating school. This allows your recommender to use the same answers for multiple letter submissions, alleviating the workload of having to answer different questions for each school multiple times. You benefit because it makes the ask for several different letters to be written on your behalf much easier.
QUESTIONS
Section 1 – Recommender Information
- Prefix
- First (Given) Name
- Middle Name
- Last (Family) Name/Surname
- Current Organization
- Current Position/Title
- Industry
- Address
- Country
- Street
- City
- State
- Postal Code
- Telephone number (including country code)
- Email Address
- (Optional) Alternative email (If you are using your personal email account for this recommendation, please enter your work email address which may be used as a verification of your identity if the applicant is admitted.)
- Context of Relationship
- Nature of relationship
- How long have you known the applicant?
- During which period of time have you had the most frequent contact with the applicant?
- If you are affiliated with the Tepper School of Business or Carnegie Mellon University, please select the option that most closely matches.
- May we contact you regarding this applicant?
- Did you use a translator?
Section 2
In this section, you will find 12 competencies and character traits that contribute to successful leadership. The competencies and character traits are grouped into five categories:
– Achievement
– Influence
– People
– Personal Qualities
– Cognitive Abilities
For each competency, please select the one button that corresponds to the behavior that you have seen the applicant most consistently exhibit. We acknowledge that all applicants have both areas of strength and areas of development. Your candid and honest appraisal will assist in evaluation of the applicant. Please assume that each level builds upon behaviors of the previous level.
Achievement
1. Initiative: Acts ahead of need/anticipates problems
0-No basis for judgment
1-Reluctant to take on new tasks; waits to be told what to do; defers to others
2-Willing to step in and take charge when required to do so
3-Takes charge spontaneously when problem needs attention
4-Volunteers for new work challenges; proactively puts in extra effort to accomplish critical or difficult tasks
5-Proactively seeks high-impact projects; steps up to challenges even when things are not going well
2. Results Orientation: Focuses on and drives toward delivering on goals, objectives, and performance improvement
0-No basis for judgment
1-Focuses on fulfilling activities at hand; unsure how work relates to goals
2-Takes actions to overcome obstacles to achieve goals
3-Independently acts to exceed goals and plans for contingencies
4-Documents activities and outcomes to learn from past; introduces incremental improvements to raise the effectiveness of team
5-Invents new approaches with measurably better results; works to deliver best-in-class performance improvements
Influence
3. Communication, Professional Impression & Poise: Delivers messages and ideas in a way that engages an audience and achieves buy-in; uses listening and other attending behaviors to reach shared understanding; remains calm and measured even in time of crisis or conflict
0-No basis for judgment
1-Struggles to get point across; neglects to understand audience’s input or perspective; lacks confidence and gets flustered under pressure
2-Works to get point across; acknowledges feedback; reframes statements when necessary to make them clearer; speaks politely; remains composed in known circumstances
3-Present views clearly and logically structures content for a broad audience; listens and responds to feedback; prepares in advance to appear confident; leaves a positive and professional impression; responds confidently in unfamiliar situations
4-Uses tailored language that appeals to specific groups; restates what others have said to check for understanding; comes across as confident; responds rapidly and strongly to crisis; looked to for advice and guidance
Structures content for senior-level meetings; maintains composure when challenged; solicits opinions and concerns, discusses them openly and adjusts communication; remains cool under pressure during conflict or crisis; channels emotion into positive action
4. Influence and Collaboration: Engages and works with people over whom one has no direct control
0-No basis for judgment
1-Does not seek input and perspective of others
2-Accepts input from others and engages them in problem solving
3-Seeks first to understand perspectives of others; takes actions to gain their support for ideas and initiatives
4-Uses tailored approaches to connect with others, influence, and achieve results
5-Uses tailored influence approaches to create and leverage a network of strategically chosen individuals to improve collective outcomes
People
5. Respect for Others: Acknowledges the value of others’ views and actions
0-No basis for judgment
1-Unwilling to acknowledge others’ points of view
2-Open to considering others’ views when confronted or offered
3-Invites input from others because of expressed respect for them and their views
4-Praises people publicly for their good actions; ensures that others’ opinions are heard before their own
5-Uses empathy and personal experience to resolve conflicts and foster mutual respect; reinforces respect with public praise when individuals solicit and use input from others
6. Team Leadership: Manages and empowers a team of formal or informal direct reports, including virtual teams
0-No basis for judgment
1-Struggles to delegate effectively (e.g. micromanages); does not organize activities or provide appropriate information to complete tasks
2-Assigns tasks and tells people what to do; checks when they are done
3-Solicits ideas and perspectives from the team; structures activities; holds members accountable
4-Actively engages the team to develop plans and resolve issues through collaboration; shows the impact of individual/team contributions
5-Recruits others into duties or roles based on insight into individual abilities; rewards those who exceed expectations; provides strong organizational support
7. Developing Others: Helps people develop their performance and ability over time
0-No basis for judgment
1-Focuses only on one’s own growth; critical of others’ efforts to develop
2-Encourages people to develop; points out mistakes to help people develop and praises them for improvements
3-Gives specific positive and negative behavioral feedback to support the development of others
4-Provides overarching practical guiding principles and recommendations that are applicable in multiple situations to direct or focus efforts on specific areas of development
5-Identifies potential in others; inspires others to develop by providing feedback, mentoring/coaching, and identifying new growth opportunities as well as supporting their effort to change
Personal Qualities
8. Trustworthiness/ Integrity: Acts consistently in line with or follows explicit values, beliefs or intentions
0-No basis for judgment
1-Follows the crowd; takes path of least resistance; gives in under pressure
2-Acts consistently with stated intentions, values, or beliefs when it is easy to do so
3-Acts spontaneously and consistently with stated intentions, values, or beliefs despite opposition
4-Initiates actions based on values or beliefs even though the actions may come with reputational risk; demonstrates the values of the team or organization publicly
5-Demonstrates high personal integrity even at personal cost; holds people accountable to the team or organizational values
9. Adaptability/ Resilience: Adapts to changing demands and circumstances without difficulty. Maintains calm optimism in the face of challenge, problems, or apparent failure
0-No basis for judgment
1-Prefers existing ways of doing things; fears failure; becomes anxious under challenging situations
2-Adapts to new methods and procedures when required to do so; remains calm in unfamiliar situations until confronted with obstacle
3-Champions adoption of new initiatives and processes; exhibits level-headedness in most environments including challenging ones; persists until obstacle is overcome
4-Seeks out disruptions as an opportunity for improvement; remains optimistic and forward-looking in difficult situations that may result in failure
5-Energized by projects with high uncertainty but potential for high reward; seeks to be the first into unknown or unfamiliar situations; welcomes learning opportunities created by failure; learns from mistakes and rebounds quickly from setbacks
10. Self Awareness: Aware of and seeks out additional input on own strengths and weaknesses
0-No basis for judgment
1-Lacks awareness of how he/she is perceived; denies or offers excuses when confronted
2-Acknowledges fault or performance problem when confronted with concrete example or data
3-Describes own key strengths and weaknesses accurately; welcomes feedback from others and discusses opportunities to change with select individuals
4-Actively seeks out feedback to explicitly address desired improvement areas or build on strengths; explores reasons for problems openly, including own faults
5-Seeks out challenging and potentially risky experiences to improve; identifies and engages with resources—people, processes, or content—to maximize strengths or mitigate weaknesses
Cognitive
11. Problem Solving: Frames problems, analyzes situations, identifies key issues, conducts analysis on the issues, and produces acceptable solution
0-No basis for judgment
1-Avoids problems; when faced with problems, sticks to what worked before, or chooses an obvious path
2-Offers solutions when the risk is low; focuses on immediate, short-term implications instead of the big picture
3-Looks beyond the obvious; identifies and focuses on the critical information needed to understand a problem, identifies root cause(s), and comes up with reasonable solutions
4-Gathers and analyzes key information using complex methods or several layers deep; integrates perspectives from a variety of sources to arrive at unexpected but practical and effective solutions
5-Applies logic to break complex problems down into manageable parts or sub-problems; solves tough and interconnected problems and can explain how the pieces are connected
12. Strategic Orientation: Thinks beyond one’s span of control and into the future to reshape the approach or scope of work
0-No basis for judgment
1-Focuses on completing work without understanding implications
2-Understands immediate issues or implications of work or analysis
3-Develops insights or recommendations within area of responsibility that have improved near-term business performance
4-Develops insights or recommendations within area of responsibility that have shaped team/organization strategy and will have impact on long-term business performance
5-Develops insights or recommendations beyond area of responsibility with impact on long-term business strategy and performance
(Optional) Is there anything about your competency ratings on which you'd like to comment? (textbox)
Based on your professional experience, how do you rate this candidate compared to her/his peer group? (select)
Overall, I … (select)
Section 3
Please answer the following questions and provide specific examples where possible.
1. Please provide a brief description of your interaction with the applicant and, if applicable, the applicant’s role in your organization. (Recommended word count: 50 words) (textbox)
2. How does the performance of the applicant compare to that of other well-qualified individuals in similar roles? (E.g. what are the applicant’s principal strengths?) (Recommended word count: 500 words) (textbox)
3. Describe the most important piece of constructive feedback you have given the applicant. Please detail the circumstances and the applicant’s response. (Recommended word count: 500 words) (textbox)
Instructions
Please submit letters of recommendation from two individuals who know you well and can offer specific examples of your performance at and contributions to an organization. Avoid choosing recommenders based on their title or status. We are more concerned with content and substance rather than reputation.
One letter of recommendation should come from a supervisor. We are looking for objectivity in the letter, and we want to hear from someone who can assess both your strengths and your weaknesses.
We prefer to hear from a current supervisor, although we understand that this may not be possible. If you are unable to ask your current supervisor, please explain the circumstances in the optional essay.
If you work for a family business or own your own company, please submit a letter from a client or outside party who does business with you and can provide an objective assessment.
The other letter can come from another professional contact or from someone who has worked with you in an organization or club, or on a volunteer project. This letter can offer a different perspective on your skill sets outside of your professional environment.
We have no preference regarding who supplies your second letter of recommendation.
Our only guideline is that it should add new and valuable insight to your candidacy.
How to Submit Letters of Recommendation
The recommendation form is part of the online application. You will be prompted to provide the names and email addresses of your recommenders, and we’ll send them an email directing them to the online form. Chicago Booth does not accept letters of recommendation via mail or fax.
We require every applicant to provide two letters of recommendation. These letters MUST be submitted via our online system. To ensure the objectivity and validity of your recommendations, the written product must be entirely your recommenders' work. Although you may discuss the recommendations with them, you may not have any involvement in drafting or submitting them.
One letter should come from a current supervisor, who can assess both your strengths and your weaknesses. If you are unable to ask your current supervisor, please explain below. The other letter can come from another professional contact or from someone who has worked with you in an organization or club, or on a volunteer project.
Note: Once you submit a recommender’s information, an email with instructions will be sent to the recommender.
QUESTIONS
Reference Information
- First Name
- Last Name
- Title
- Company Name
- Industry
- Contact Information
- Country
- Street
- City
- State
- Postal Code
- Email Address:
- Phone Number:
- Reference Relationship: (select)
- How long have you known the applicant? __________
- Do you have an MBA degree? (select)
- Are you in any way affiliated with The University of Chicago or Chicago Booth? (select)
Skills Assessment
Please assess the candidate's skills in the following areas. Your honest and candid assessment greatly helps the Admissions Committee in evaluating the candidate.
Most candidates will have a range of marks; it is rare for a candidate to exceed expectations in all areas.
For each skill, select: Unable to Assess ; Area of Concern ; Opportunity for Development ; Solid/Meets Expectations ; Strength/Exceeds Expectations ; Ability to adapt to change
- Self-awareness/Maturity
- Openness to feedback and constructive criticism
- Interpersonal skills with colleagues/subordinates
- Interpersonal skills with superiors/executives
- Confidence
- Initiative/Self-motivation
- Collaboration/Teamwork
- Critical thinking and problem solving skills
- Respect for diverse perspectives
- Capacity to lead
Peer Comparison
- Based on your professional experience, how does the applicant rate within his or her peer group? (select)
- Please indicate the reference group for this comparison: _________
- Overall, I: (select)
Letter of Recommendation
Please provide a written letter of recommendation in support of the applicant addressing the following questions:
1. How do the applicant's performance, potential, background, or personal qualities compare to those of other well-qualified candidates in similar roles? Please provide specific examples.
2. Please describe the most important piece of constructive feedback you have given the applicant. Please detail the circumstances and the applicant's response.
(upload file)
INSTRUCTIONS
First-time applicants require one recommendation. Reapplicants are required to submit one new recommendation. If you have been working full-time for at least six months, your recommendation should ideally be from your current supervisor. If you are unable to secure a recommendation from your direct supervisor, please submit a statement of explanation in the Employment section of your application. Beyond your direct supervisor, other recommender options include: a former direct supervisor or another professional associate, senior to you, who can share their insights on your candidacy.
If you have worked full-time for fewer than six months, your recommendation should be from a person who can comment on your managerial abilities. You may ask a summer employer or another person whom you feel can objectively assess your professional promise. If you are a college senior, we encourage you to apply for the Deferred Enrollment Program.
Please note that Columbia Business School and several of our peer institutions use similar, if not identical, recommendation questions. This is an effort on our part to make the process easier for your recommender. We expect that you, the applicant, will not participate in the drafting of your recommendation. When entering contact information for recommenders, please use their institutional or professional email address. We ask that the recommender upload their recommendation on letterhead, whenever possible. References submitted from personal or anonymous email accounts (e.g. Gmail, Yahoo, 123.com, 163.com, qq.com etc.) will be subject to your admission being rescinded if significant discrepancies are found. Applications are not considered complete until all required information is submitted; this includes your recommendation.
Please enter information for one individual you wish to submit a recommendation on your behalf. They should be able to speak directly about your performance and professional promise.
If you have been working full-time for at least six months, your recommendation should ideally be from your current supervisor. If you are unable to secure a recommendation from your direct supervisor, please add a statement of explanation in the Employment section of your application. Beyond your direct supervisor, other recommender options include: a former direct supervisor or another professional associate, senior to you, who can share their insights on your candidacy.
For applicants with family business, entrepreneurial, or non-traditional backgrounds, you may submit a recommendation from a former supervisor or a client. Letters may not be submitted from family members.
Recommendations- Read more about recommendations on our website.
Please note:
We expect that you, the applicant, will not participate in the drafting or submitting of your recommendation. The relationship to your recommender should be accurate.
The letter of recommendation should be on professional letterhead whenever possible.
Please enter your recommender's institutional or professional email address. If a personal email address is used, please use the optional essay section to provide the reasoning.
Applications are not considered complete until all required information is submitted; this includes your recommendation.
Reapplicants must provide an updated letter of recommendation. It is recommended, but not required, that this new recommendation be from a new recommender who can provide additional insights on your candidacy.
Make sure that you and your recommender adjust spam filters to allow emails from apply@gsb.columbia.edu.
If admitted, your recommender will be contacted by Re Vera Services, LLC to verify the authenticity of the letter of recommendation. Inaccurate information will necessitate a supplemental review, and offers of admission may be rescinded if significant discrepancies are found.
QUESTIONS
Recommender Information
- Prefix
- First Name
- Last Name
- Organization
- Position/Title
- Industry
- Relationship
- Telephone
If the candidate enrolls in Columbia Business School's MBA program, you will be contacted, via the email provided, by Re Vera Services, LLC, who will verify the authenticity of your recommendation. Re Vera Services requires your city, state, and country to assist in their verification process.
- Country
- City
- State
Business Card Upload
Please provide your current business card. If you don't have a business card, please submit another form of proof of employment. Examples: Screenshot of a profile on an internal company website, link to profile on public company website, etc.
MBA Information
Do you have an MBA? (select)
Recommendation Upload
Please consider the following guidelines when writing your recommendation:
1. How do the candidate’s performance, potential, background, or personal qualities compare to those of other well-qualified individuals in similar roles? Please provide specific examples.
2. Describe the most important piece of constructive feedback you have given the applicant. Please detail the circumstances and the applicant's response.
Limit your recommendation to 1000 words. Please submit your recommendation as a PDF or Word document on letterhead, if possible. Thank you once again.
(Upload file)
The letter I submit here is my own work.
(check) I acknowledge
INSTRUCTIONS
One letter of recommendation is required, but you may submit up to two for review by the committee. You should seek recommendations from people capable of commenting on your professional, leadership, and intellectual capabilities. The most useful evaluations are from people who are able to speak with certainty about your leadership, maturity, team orientation, analytical skills, and interpersonal skills. Examples include a current supervisor, colleague, client, or former supervisor.
Provide contact information for at least one and a maximum of two individuals who are eager to endorse your candidacy. At Johnson, we view official letters of recommendation as a vital part of the final evaluation process. Carefully follow the instructions below.
QUESTIONS
Recommender Information
Thank you for taking the time to write this letter of recommendation on behalf of the applicant. The Admissions Committee greatly appreciates hearing your views.
Please verify your information and provide answers for the additional questions.
Comment on the following topics when constructing the letter of recommendation:
- Strengths and outstanding qualities
- How applicant gets along with others
- Oral and written communication skills
- English language ability if English is not the applicant's native language
- Areas of improvement (weaknesses)
- Anything else you would like to say about the applicant
Please write on company letterhead if company policy allows and also note that a one page recommendation letter is sufficient. Please upload the letter of recommendation at the bottom of this form.
- Prefix
- Recommender First Name
- Middle Name
- Recommender Last Name
- Employer
- Position/Title
- Industry
- Address Line 1
- Address Line 2
- City
- Country
- Zip/Postal Code
- Recommender Phone
- Professional Email
- What is the context of your relationship to this recommender?
- What is or was your recommender’s role in relation to you?
- How long have you known the applicant?
- Most Frequent Contact From Date
- Most Frequent Contact To Date
- If you are affiliated with the Johnson School or Cornell University, please select the option that most closely matches.
- May we contact you regarding this applicant
- Do you use a translator
Applicant Assessment
For each competency, please mark the one button corresponding to the behavior that you have seen the applicant most consistently exhibit. We acknowledge that all applicants have both areas of strength and areas of development. Your candid, honest appraisal will assist in evaluation of the applicant. Please assume that each level build upon behaviors of the previous level.
*Initiative: Acts ahead of need/anticipates problems
No basis for judgement
Reluctant to take on new tasks; waits to be told what to do; defers to others
Willing to step in and take action when required to do so
Takes charge spontaneously when problem need attention
Volunteer for new work challenges; proactively puts in extra effort to accomplish critical or difficult tasks
Proactively seeks high-impact projects; steps up to challenges even when things are not going well
*Results Orientation: Focuses on and drives toward delivering on goals, objectives, and performance improvement
No basis for judgement
Focuses on fulfilling activities at hand; unsure how work relates to goals
Takes actions to overcome obstacles to achieve goals
Independently acts to exceed goals and plans for contingencies
Documents activities and outcomes to learn from past; introduces incremental improvements to raise the effectiveness of team
Invents new approaches with measurably better results; works to deliver best-in-class performance improvements
Communication, Prof Impression & Poise: Delivers messages and ideas in a way that engages an audience and achieves buy-in; uses listening and other attending behaviors to reach shared understanding; remains calm even in time of crisis or conflict
No basis for judgement
Struggles to get point across; neglects to understand audience's input or perspective; lacks confidence and gests flustered under pressure
Works to get point across; acknowledges feedback; reframes statements when necessary to make them clearer; speaks politely; remains composed in known circumstances
Present views clearly and logically structures content for a broad audience; listens and responds to feedback; prepares in advance to appear confident; leaves a positive and professional impression; responds confidently in unfamiliar situations
Uses tailored language that appeals to specific groups; restates what others have said to check for understanding; comes across as confident; responds rapidly and strongly to crisis; looked to for advice and guidance
Structures content for senior-level meetings; maintains composure when challenged; solicits options and concerns, discusses them openly and adjusts communication; when in strong conflict or crisis, remains cool under pressure; channels strong emotion into positive action
*Influence and Collaboration: Engages and works with people outside of one’s direct control
No basis for judgment
Does not seek input and perspective of others
Accepts input from others and engages them in problem solving
Seeks first to understand perspectives of others; takes actions to gain their support for ideas and initiatives
Uses tailored approaches to connect with others, influence, and achieve results
Uses tailored influence approaches to create and leverage a network of strategically chosen individuals to improve collective outcomes
*Respect For Others: Acknowledges the value of others’ views and actions
No basis for judgment
Unwilling to acknowledge others’ points of view
Open to considering others’ views when confronted or offered
Invites input from others because of expressed respect for them and their views
Praises people publicly for their good actions; ensures that others’ opinions are heard before their own
Uses empathy and personal experience to resolve conflicts and foster mutual respect; reinforces respect with public praise when individuals solicit and use input from others
*Team Leadership: Manages and empowers a team of direct reports or peers on project based teams (includes virtual teams)
No basis for judgment
Struggles to delegate effectively (e.g. micromanages); does not organize activities or provide appropriate information to complete tasks
Assigns tasks and tells people what to do; checks when they are done
Solicits ideas and perspectives from the team; structures activities; holds members accountable
Actively engages the team to develop plans and resolve issues through collaboration; shows the impact of individual/team contributions
Recruits others into duties or roles based on insight into individual abilities; rewards those who exceed expectations; provides strong organizational support
*Developing Others: Helps people develop their performance and ability over time
No basis for judgment
Focuses only on one’s own growth; critical of others’ efforts to develop
Encourages people to develop; points out mistakes to help people develop and praises them for improvements
Gives specific positive and negative behavioral feedback to support the development of others
Provides overarching practical guiding principles and recommendations that are applicable in multiple situations to direct or focus efforts on specific areas of development
Identifies potential in others; inspires others to develop by providing feedback, mentoring/coaching, and identifying new growth opportunities as well as supporting their effort to change
*Trustworthiness/Integrity: Acts consistently in line with or follows explicit values, beliefs or intentions
No basis for judgment
Follows the crowd; takes path of least resistance; gives in under pressure
Acts consistently with stated intentions, values, or beliefs when it is easy to do so
Acts spontaneously and consistently with stated intentions, values, or beliefs despite opposition
Initiates actions based on values or beliefs even though the actions may come with reputational risk; demonstrates the values of the team or organization publicly
Demonstrates high personal integrity even at personal cost; holds people accountable to the team or organizational values
*Adaptability/Resilience: Adapts to changing demands and circumstances without difficulty. Maintains calm optimism in the face of challenge, problems, or apparent failure
No basis for judgment
Prefers existing ways of doing things; fears failure; becomes anxious under challenging situations
Adapts to new methods and procedures when required to do so; remains calm in unfamiliar situations until confronted with obstacle
Champions adoption of new initiatives and processes; exhibits level-headedness in most environments including challenging ones; persists until obstacle is overcome
Seeks out disruptions as an opportunity for improvement; remains optimistic and forward-looking in difficult situations that may result in failure
Energized by projects with high uncertainty but potential for high reward; seeks to be the first into unknown or unfamiliar situations; welcomes learning opportunities created by failure; learns from mistakes and rebounds quickly from setbacks
*Self Awareness: Aware of and seeks out additional input on own strengths and weaknesses
No basis for judgment
Lacks awareness of how he/she is perceived; denies or offers excuses when confronted
Acknowledges fault or performance problem when confronted with concrete example or data
Describes own key strengths and weaknesses accurately; welcomes feedback from others and discusses opportunities to change with select individuals
Actively seeks out feedback to explicitly address desired improvement areas or build on strengths; explores reasons for problems openly, including own faults
Seeks out challenging and potentially risky experiences to improve; identifies and engages with resources—people, processes, or content—to maximize strengths or mitigate weaknesses
*Problem Solving: Frames problems, analyzes situations, identifies key issues, conducts analysis on the issues, and produces acceptable solution
No basis for judgment
Avoids problems; when faced with problems, sticks to what worked before, or chooses an obvious path
Offers solutions when the risk is low; focuses on immediate, short-term implications instead of the big picture
Looks beyond the obvious; identifies and focuses on the critical information needed to understand a problem, identifies root cause(s), and comes up with reasonable solutions
Gathers and analyzes key information using complex methods or several layers deep; integrates perspectives from a variety of sources to arrive at unexpected but practical and effective solutions
Applies logic to break complex problems down into manageable parts or sub-problems; solves tough and interconnected problems and can explain how the pieces are connected
*Strategic Orientation: Thinks beyond one’s span of control and into the future to reshape the approach or scope of work
No basis for judgment
Focuses on completing work without understanding implications
Understands immediate issues or implications of work or analysis
Develops insights or recommendations within area of responsibility that have improved near-term business performance
Develops insights or recommendations within area of responsibility that have shaped team/organization strategy and will have impact on long-term business performance
Develops insights or recommendations beyond area of responsibility with impact on long-term business strategy and performance
(Optional) Is there anything about your ratings on which you would like to comment? Please share any additional thoughts about the candidate and/or clarify your ratings below. (textbox)
Recommendation Questions
You may answer all of these question by uploading a letter of recommendation.
1. Please provide a brief description of your interaction with the applicant and, if applicable, the applicant's role in your organization. (Recommended word count: 50 words) (textbox)
2. How does the applicant's performance compare to that of other well-qualified individuals in similar roles? Please provide specific examples. (E.g. what are the applicant's principal strengths?) (Recommended word count: 500 words) (textbox)
3. Describe the most important piece of constructive feedback you have given the applicant. Please detail the circumstances and the applicant’s response. (Recommended word count: 500 words) (textbox)
4. (Optional) Is there anything about your ratings on which you would like to comment? (textbox)
Please upload recommendation letter.
Capstone
*Based on your professional experience, how do you rate this applicant compared to her/his peer group? (select)
*Overall, I (select)
Instructions
MBA applicants are required to submit one professional letter of recommendation.*
Your recommender should speak to your academic and interpersonal abilities, technical aptitude and/or professional experiences in tech, your experience working on teams, and any areas of improvement.
Your letter of recommendation should come from a current or former manager, supervisor, or someone who has managed/supervised you in a professional capacity. Unless you are a full-time entrepreneur, we generally advise that you do not choose clients, co-founders, or colleagues to write your recommendation. Only one letter is required, but you may submit an additional letter if relevant to your candidacy for the program.
Please ensure that these letters are sent from a professional email address. This is to maintain the integrity and credibility of the recommendations.
*If you are an entrepreneur, CEO, and/or co-founder of a company, you may submit a recommendation from a co-founder, long-term client, or previous supervisor. While not required, we recommend submitting two recommendation letters if this applies to you.
Questions marked with an asterisk (*) are required.
*If your recommender is having issues receiving the recommendation email, it might be that their company firewall is preventing the email from going through. If this is the case, they may email us the letter directly to Admissions@tech.cornell.edu
*Note, the recommendation letter can be submitted after the deadline date but the application will normally not be reviewed until recommendations are received.
QUESTIONS
Below are instructions for writing your letter of recommendation:
Core Competency Rating:
Please provide a letter of recommendation for the applicant. Ideal letters are no more than 700 words, and should address the following list of attributes based on your experience with the applicant.
Appraisal of academic and interpersonal abilities:
Examples: Quantitative aptitude, teamwork, dependability, leadership, motivation
Technical aptitude and/or professional experiences in tech:
Examples: Specific programming and data structure platforms, entrepreneurship, innovation
Project and Team-based activities:
Examples: Leadership, time management, communication, conflict resolution, technical documentation and research
Areas of improvement:
Provide an example of when you provided the applicant feedback and describe that interaction?
If you have issues submitting your letter, have your recommender email the letter to admissions@tech.cornell.edu.
Your Contact Info
- First Name
- Last Name
- Employers Name
- Professional Title
- How do you know the applicant?
- How many years have you known the applicant?
- Are you affiliated with Cornell University?
The applicant may request us to share your letter of recommendation with other Cornell program admissions offices. Please indicate below whether you give us your permission. If not, your letter of recommendation will not be shared with the other admissions offices. (Yes/No)
Please upload your recommendation letter below. (upload file)
INSTRUCTIONS
All recommenders are required to use the common letter of recommendation form associated with the online application. Once your request has been sent, your recommender will receive an email notifying them of the date their recommendation should be submitted. Your application may be submitted, but it will not be considered "complete" until we have received your recommendation.
The most valuable recommendations come from individuals who know you well in either an academic or professional setting. Recommendations from relatives or family friends are discouraged by the Admissions Committee.
In addition to the professional recommendation, if you have a Fuqua alum or current student who would like to submit an endorsement on your behalf, please share this endorsement form link with them so they may tell us why you would be an asset to our program. Our alumni know what it takes to be successful at Fuqua and we welcome alumni endorsements of your candidacy. Please note, endorsement forms are not required and only provide compelling support for a candidate when they are written by an alum or current student who knows you well.
Please refer below to the recommendation requirements for the specific program to which you are applying. Check with your recommender to ensure they have received the recommendation request, as corporate firewalls may sometimes impact email delivery.
One letter of recommendation is required. The most valuable recommendations come from people who know your professional skills and abilities. We require that you submit one recommendation from your current or previous supervisor. If you do not have an immediate supervisor, you may submit a recommendation from someone who knows you well in your current position and can critique your professional performance. If you are unable to provide a recommendation from your current supervisor, please clarify in the text box below.
If you are a reapplicant and would like to submit a new letter of recommendation, you must first remove your previous recommender(s) by clicking “Edit” and then deleting the recommender. After removing that information, simply click “Add Recommender” and input the contact information for your new recommender.
QUESTIONS
Section 1 – Recommender Information
- Prefix
- First (Given) Name
- Middle Name
- Last (Family) Name/Surname
- Current Organization
- Current Position/Title
- Industry
- Address
- Country
- Street
- City
- State
- Postal Code
- Telephone number (including country code)
- Email Address (view only: entered by applicant)
- (Optional) Alternative email (If you are using your personal email account for this recommendation, please enter your work email address which may be used as a verification of your identity if the applicant is admitted.)
- Context of Relationship
- Nature of relationship
- How long have you known the applicant?
- During which period of time have you had the most frequent contact with the applicant?
- Please select the option that most closely matches your affiliation with The Fuqua School of Business or Duke University, if any, or else select Not affiliated.
- May we contact you regarding this applicant?
- Did you use a translator?
Section 2
In this section, you will find 16 competencies and character traits that contribute to successful leadership. The competencies and character traits are grouped into five categories:
– Achievement
– Influence
– People
– Personal Qualities
– Cognitive Abilities
For each competency, please select the one button that corresponds to the behavior that you have seen the applicant most consistently exhibit. We acknowledge that all applicants have both areas of strength and areas of development. Your candid and honest appraisal will assist in evaluation of the applicant. Please assume that each level builds upon behaviors of the previous level.
Achievement
1. Initiative: Acts ahead of need/anticipates problems
0 – No basis for judgment
1 – Reluctant to take on new tasks; waits to be told what to do; defers to others
2 – Willing to step in and take charge when required to do so
3 – Takes charge spontaneously when problem needs attention
4 – Volunteers for new work challenges; proactively puts in extra effort to accomplish critical or difficult tasks
5 – Proactively seeks high-impact projects; steps up to challenges even when things are not going well
2. Results Orientation: Focuses on and drives toward delivering on goals, objectives, and performance improvement
0 – No basis for judgment
1 – Focuses on fulfilling activities at hand; unsure how work relates to goals
2 – Takes actions to overcome obstacles to achieve goals
3 – Independently acts to exceed goals and plans for contingencies
4 – Documents activities and outcomes to learn from past; introduces incremental improvements to raise the effectiveness of team
5 – Invents new approaches with measurably better results; works to deliver best-in-class performance improvements
Influence
3. Communication, Professional Impression & Poise: Delivers messages and ideas in a way that engages an audience and achieves buy-in; uses listening and other attending behaviors to reach shared understanding; remains calm and measured even in time of crisis or conflict
0 – No basis for judgment
1 – Struggles to get point across; neglects to understand audience’s input or perspective; lacks confidence and gets flustered under pressure
2 – Works to get point across; acknowledges feedback; reframes statements when necessary to make them clearer; speaks politely; remains composed in known circumstances
3 – Present views clearly and logically structures content for a broad audience; listens and responds to feedback; prepares in advance to appear confident; leaves a positive and professional impression; responds confidently in unfamiliar situations
4 – Uses tailored language that appeals to specific groups; restates what others have said to check for understanding; comes across as confident; responds rapidly and strongly to crisis; looked to for advice and guidance
5-Structures content for senior-level meetings; maintains composure when challenged; solicits opinions & concerns, discusses them openly and adjusts communication; remains cool under pressure during conflict or crisis; channels emotion into positive action
4. Influence and Collaboration: Engages and works with people over whom one has no direct control
0 – No basis for judgment
1 – Does not seek input and perspective of others
2 – Accepts input from others and engages them in problem solving
3 – Seeks first to understand perspectives of others; takes actions to gain their support for ideas and initiatives
4 – Uses tailored approaches to connect with others, influence, and achieve results
5 – Uses tailored influence approaches to create and leverage a network of strategically chosen individuals to improve collective outcomes
People
5. Respect for Others: Acknowledges the value of others’ views and actions
0 – No basis for judgment
1 – Unwilling to acknowledge others’ points of view
2 – Open to considering others’ views when confronted or offered
3 – Invites input from others because of expressed respect for them and their views
4 – Praises people publicly for their good actions; ensures that others’ opinions are heard before their own
5 – Uses empathy and personal experience to resolve conflicts and foster mutual respect; reinforces respect with public praise when individuals solicit and use input from others
6. Team Leadership: Manages and empowers a team of formal or informal direct reports, including virtual teams
0 – No basis for judgment
1 – Struggles to delegate effectively (e.g. micromanages); does not organize activities or provide appropriate information to complete tasks
2 – Assigns tasks and tells people what to do; checks when they are done
3 – Solicits ideas and perspectives from the team; structures activities; holds members accountable
4 – Actively engages the team to develop plans and resolve issues through collaboration; shows the impact of individual/team contributions
5 – Recruits others into duties or roles based on insight into individual abilities; rewards those who exceed expectations; provides strong organizational support
7. Developing Others: Helps people develop their performance and ability over time
0 – No basis for judgment
1 – Focuses only on one’s own growth; critical of others’ efforts to develop
2 – Encourages people to develop; points out mistakes to help people develop and praises them for improvements
3 – Gives specific positive and negative behavioral feedback to support the development of others
4 – Provides overarching practical guiding principles and recommendations that are applicable in multiple situations to direct or focus efforts on specific areas of development
5 – Identifies potential in others; inspires others to develop by providing feedback, mentoring/coaching, and identifying new growth opportunities as well as supporting their effort to change
Personal Qualities
8. Trustworthiness/ Integrity: Acts consistently in line with or follows explicit values, beliefs, or intentions
0 – No basis for judgment
1 – Follows the crowd; takes path of least resistance; gives in under pressure
2 – Acts consistently with stated intentions, values, or beliefs when it is easy to do so
3 – Acts spontaneously and consistently with stated intentions, values, or beliefs despite opposition
4 – Initiates actions based on values or beliefs even though the actions may come with reputational risk; demonstrates the values of the team or organization publicly
5 – Demonstrates high personal integrity even at personal cost; holds people accountable to the team or organizational values
9. Adaptability/ Resilience: Adapts to changing demands and circumstances without difficulty. Maintains calm optimism in the face of challenge, problems, or apparent failure
0 – No basis for judgment
1 – Prefers existing ways of doing things; fears failure; becomes anxious under challenging situations
2 – Adapts to new methods and procedures when required to do so; remains calm in unfamiliar situations until confronted with obstacle
3 – Champions adoption of new initiatives and processes; exhibits level-headedness in most environments including challenging ones; persists until obstacle is overcome
4 – Seeks out disruptions as an opportunity for improvement; remains optimistic and forward-looking in difficult situations that may result in failure
5 – Energized by projects with high uncertainty but potential for high reward; seeks to be the first into unknown or unfamiliar situations; welcomes learning opportunities created by failure; learns from mistakes and rebounds quickly from setbacks
10. Self Awareness: Aware of and seeks out additional input on own strengths and weaknesses
0 – No basis for judgment
1 – Lacks awareness of how he/she is perceived; denies or offers excuses when confronted
2 – Acknowledges fault or performance problem when confronted with concrete example or data
3 – Describes own key strengths and weaknesses accurately; welcomes feedback from others and discusses opportunities to change with select individuals
4 – Actively seeks out feedback to explicitly address desired improvement areas or build on strengths; explores reasons for problems openly, including own faults
5 – Seeks out challenging and potentially risky experiences to improve; identifies and engages with resources—people, processes, or content—to maximize strengths or mitigate weaknesses
Cognitive
11. Problem Solving: Frames problems, analyzes situations, identifies key issues, conducts analysis on the issues, and produces acceptable solution
0 – No basis for judgment
1 – Avoids problems; when faced with problems, sticks to what worked before, or chooses an obvious path
2 – Offers solutions when the risk is low; focuses on immediate, short-term implications instead of the big picture
3 – Looks beyond the obvious; identifies and focuses on the critical information needed to understand a problem, identifies root cause(s), and comes up with reasonable solutions
4 – Gathers and analyzes key information using complex methods or several layers deep; integrates perspectives from a variety of sources to arrive at unexpected but practical and effective solutions
5 – Applies logic to break complex problems down into manageable parts or sub-problems; solves tough and interconnected problems and can explain how the pieces are connected
12. Strategic Orientation: Thinks beyond one’s span of control and into the future to reshape the approach or scope of work
0 – No basis for judgment
1 – Focuses on completing work without understanding implications
2 – Understands immediate issues or implications of work or analysis
3 – Develops insights or recommendations within area of responsibility that have improved near-term business performance
4 – Develops insights or recommendations within area of responsibility that have shaped team/organization strategy and will have impact on long-term business performance
5 – Develops insights or recommendations beyond area of responsibility with impact on long-term business strategy and performance
(Optional) Is there anything about your competency ratings on which you'd like to comment? (textbox)
Based on your professional experience, how do you rate this candidate compared to her/his peer group? (select)
Overall, I … (select)
Section 3
Please answer the following questions and provide specific examples where possible.
1. Please provide a brief description of your interaction with the applicant and, if applicable, the applicant’s role in your organization. (Recommended word count: 50 words) (textbox)
2. How does the performance of the applicant compare to that of other well-qualified individuals in similar roles? (E.g. what are the applicant’s principal strengths?) (Recommended word count: 500 words) (textbox)
3. Describe the most important piece of constructive feedback you have given the applicant. Please detail the circumstances and the applicant’s response. (Recommended word count: 500 words) (textbox)
4. (Optional) Is there anything else we should know?
Upload file, Or, type or copy-and-paste your document here: (textbox)
Two recommendation letters are required, at least one professional.
Questions
1. How long have you known the candidate? In which context? (textbox, max. 1000 characters)
2. What do you consider to be the candidate's most noteworthy qualities? (textbox, max. 500 characters)
3. What are the areas in which you believe the candidate needs to improve? (textbox, max. 500 characters)
4. Please comment on the candidate’s potential for management. Describe an occasion in which you observed the candidate in a leadership role. (textbox, max. 500 characters)
Evaluation grid
Please give us your opinion in terms of the following criteria (for each skill, select: exceptiona ; good ; average ; poor ; unobserved)
- Leadership potential
- Organizational skills
- Teamwork
- Maturity
- Self-confidence
- Creativity
Additional Comments
Please add information on the ratings you have assigned and make any additional comments about the applicant’s motivation, ability, leadership potential or any personal qualities you would like the Admissions Committee to take into account. (textbox, max. 32000 characters)
Upload additional supporting letter here (upload file)
INSTRUCTIONS
You will need to have two recommendations submitted online by the application deadlines. It is the applicant's responsibility to ensure that all recommendations are submitted online by the deadline date for the round in which the applicant is applying.
Use your best judgment on who you decide to ask – there is no set formula for who should be your recommenders. We know it is not always possible to have a direct supervisor write your recommendation – we would not want you to jeopardize your current position for the application process. Look at the questions we are asking recommenders to complete. Find people who know you well enough to answer them. This can be a former supervisor, a colleague, or someone you collaborate on an activity outside of work. How well a person knows you should take priority over level of seniority or HBS alumni status.
Recommendations must be completed online.
Please submit two recommendations (no more, no less!) from individuals who can speak directly about your professional performance and promise. Recommendations must be completed online.
Who should I choose to be my recommenders? The Admissions Committee suggests (but does not require) that one recommendation be from your direct supervisor. This is a guideline, not a requirement. We are aware that not all candidates will be able to do this.
The other recommendation should be from someone who can comment on your leadership skills and/or potential; this may be a former supervisor, another professional associate, or even a client (e.g. if you work in your family business or if you are an entrepreneur). In general, we discourage peer recommendations and recommendations from professors but recognize that each applicant brings a different set of experiences. So, please use your best judgment on who you decide to ask – you'll want to choose people who will help you put your best foot forward.
Worth mentioning here, because we are asked this a lot: No, we don't give special consideration to recommendations written by HBS alums, and you don't need to have an HBS recommender to be admitted. (Most admitted students don't!)
What if my recommender doesn't submit? We review all submitted applications. It is your responsibility to ensure that we receive all of your application materials, including recommendations.
What if my recommender doesn't receive an email from HBS? Filling out the information below generates an automated email to your recommender. Sometimes servers (especially those at large companies) reject or block automated emails, which means your recommenders might have trouble receiving the link they needs to complete your recommendation. Have no fear — we can fix this! Send an email to ApplyTech@hbs.edu with your recommender's name and we'll get it sorted out.
What if I need to change my recommender? If you need to change your recommender's email address for any reason, you need to exclude that recommender from consideration and then re-enter the information. If you do so, your recommender will lose whatever work has been entered into the recommendation already, so be careful!
Remember to verify accuracy. Web browsers occasionally auto-fill fields incorrectly. Before submitting the request, please ensure that all information is accurate – and remind your recommenders to do the same!
QUESTIONS
Part 1: Your Information
- Name
- Prefix
- First Name
- Middle Name
- Last Name
- Contact Information
- Telephone
- Country
- Street
- City
- State
- Postal Code
- Current Employment
- Organization
- Position/Title
- Do you know this applicant from a previous employer?
- HBS Background – Are you a graduate of the Harvard Business School MBA program?
Part 2: Relationship Context
- Relationship Type (select)
- Relationship Context (select)
- Number of applicants you are recommending to the HBS MBA Program this year: ___
Please provide a brief description of your interaction with the applicant and, if applicable, their role in your organization: (textbox, 300 characters)
Part 3: Candidate Evaluation
The MBA Admissions Board would like to learn more about the candidate's strengths and areas of development. For each attribute, please indicate how you have experienced the candidate. All candidates are growing professionally and therefore some of their attributes are likely to be more developed than others. It is helpful to the Admissions Committee to understand your assessment of the candidate's relative strengths compared to areas they are actively working to develop. To that end, we ask that you distribute the ratings across the whole grid accordingly.
For each attribute, select: No Basis for Judgment ; Potential Area of Concern ; Developing ; Strong ; Distinctive
Business-Minded
- Analytical thinking
- Professional maturity
- Quantitative skills
- Verbal communication
- Written communication
Leadership-Focused
- Awareness of and respect for others
- Emotional intelligence
- Integrity
- Interpersonal skills with colleagues and subordinates
- Interpersonal skills with superiors
- Listening skills
- Teamwork: engagement and collaboration
- Teamwork: leadership and development of others
Growth-Oriented
- Creative problem solving
- Curiosity
- Initiative
- Openness to others' perspectives
- Receptiveness to feedback and willingness to change
- Self-awareness
Please use this space to comment on the ratings you have assigned, elaborating on relative strengths and opportunities for further development. (Required) (textbox, 150 words)
Part 4: Open Response Questions
Please respond to the questions below in a single document.
1. How do the applicant's performance, potential, background, or personal qualities compare to those of other well-qualified individuals in similar roles? Please provide specific examples. (Recommended: 300 words)
2. Please describe the most important piece of constructive feedback you have given the applicant. Please detail the circumstances and the applicant’s response. (Recommended: 250 words)
3. (Optional) Is there anything else we should know? Please be concise.
(upload file)
INSTRUCTIONS
Please provide the names and contact information for two referees who will be responsible for submitting MBA recommendations for you. Once you have input their details, you can either:
– send the recommendation forms to them immediately, or
– wait to send the the forms until you click "submit" on your application
We suggest sending the recommendation forms as early as possible to give your referees the maximum time to complete them. All recommendations received will be saved in the application, regardless of when you submit your file.
Please make sure your two referees are prepared to provide true and accurate feedback on your academic ability and professional qualifications.
Please inform your referees that they will receive an email regarding your HEC Paris MBA application. This email will contain important login information to complete our online recommendation form, inlcuding a website address, username and password to access their individual form. If either of your referees do not receive this email, please ask them to check their spam folder for messages from hecmba@topapply.com (check to see if possible to send from AO's email and have them add this address to their safe-senders list.
QUESTIONS
Relationship to candidate:
- How long and in what capacity have you known the candidate? (textbox)
- If this is a work related reference, in what position is/was the candidate employed and for how long? (textbox)
Candidate's abilities:
Please evaluate the candidate in terms of the qualities below (for each skill, seelct from drop-down: outstanding ; excellent ; very good ; good ; average ; below average ; unobserved)
- Intellectual or academic ability
- Oral communication skills
- Analytical skills
- Teamwork skills
- Creativity / Innovative
- Competence in current position
- Written communication skills
- Leadership skills
- Initiative / problem solving skills
Proficiency in English:
- Candidate's first language? (select)
Candidate's strengths and weaknesses:
- What do you consider to be the candidate's principal strengths / talents? (textbox)
- What do you consider to be the candidate's weaknesses or areas that need improvement? (textbox)
About you:
- First name
- Last name
- Job title or position held
- Company name
INSTRUCTIONS
One Letter of recommendation is required. You may register up to 3 recommenders for this application if you consider it necessary.
This letter should reflect your capacities in the work environment. Recommendations from former employers or clients, and extra-curricular activities such as Volunteer Organizations can also be considered.
Recommendation letters can be submitted in Spanish and/or English.
If you are not sure if your recommender meets our criteria please contact your admissions director to clarify.
Please enter the following information to allow your letter writers to submit your recommendations online. It is imperative that you accurately enter the information as your recommender will receive an automated email informing him/her of the online process and the instructions and questions on what they need to complete for your application.
The recommenders can still fill up their forms and submit up to 10 days post the round deadline.
Enter the contact information of your recommender below, and then click “Send Invitation”. You may add additional recommenders by selecting the + icon. If you need to edit or remove an individual, use the trash can icon to delete the entry. Please note, once the status is submitted, you will not be able to remove the recommender from your application.
QUESTIONS
Recommender Information
- First Name
- Last Name
- Position or Title
- School, Institution or Company
Please elaborate on your professional relationship with the candidate providing details on such – the duration of your relationship, nature of projects you worked on, and so on, etc) (textbox, 100 words)
1. How do the candidate's performance, potential, or personal qualities compare to those of other well-qualified individuals in similar roles? Please provide specific examples. (textbox, 300 words)
2. Please describe the most important piece of constructive feedback you have given the applicant. Please detail the circumstances and the applicant's response. (textbox, 250 words)
INSTRUCTIONS
Applicants should submit one recommendation. Your recommender should be someone who can comment meaningfully on your professional performance. A current or recent past supervisor is preferred. Your recommender will receive an email with a link to the recommendation form that they will complete and submit online. If they would like to provide additional information, they may upload a supplemental letter or document. Uploading an additional letter or document is optional. Recommendations are due by the application deadline.
Once you have saved an electronic recommendation, an email request will automatically be sent to the recommender on your behalf. Please advise your recommender to look for this email in their inbox, as well as their spam or junk-mail folder, as emails do occasionally get filtered out.
QUESTIONS
Relationship
- How well and in what capacity do you know the applicant? (textbox, 500 characters)
- Does the applicant have potential to be a leader and manager? What have you observed that leads you to think the applicant will be successful? (textbox, 500 characters)
- Are there areas where the applicant can improve their potential for graduate study in a managerial career? If so, what are those areas? (textbox, 500 characters)
- You'll rate the applicant on the qualities below. What group or population are you comparing the applicant with? (textbox, 500 characters)
Likert Analysis
For each skill below, select: Not Observed ; Extremely Poor ; Below Average ; Average ; Above Average ; Excellent
- *Leadership ability
- *Intellectual potential
- *Organizational skills
- *Verbal skills
- *Writing ability
- *Analytical skills
- *Ability to work in a team
- *Maturity
- *Self-confidence
- *Creativity
- *Initiative
- *Sense of humor; ability to keep things in perspective
Recommendation
- Do you recommend that the applicant be admitted to this program? (Choose an option)
Letter
Upload your recommendation letter.
Note: the file in Microsoft Word (.doc or .docx), Portable Document Format (.pdf), Rich Text Format (.rtf), or Plain Text File (.txt). File size should be less than 15 MB. File name should be less than 95 characters.
(UPLOAD)
INSTRUCTIONS
Two Letters of Recommendation are required. At least one recommendation should come from your workplace; your current supervisor or manager is usually a good choice. The other recommendation should be from someone who has had a chance to evaluate you in a professional setting, for example, a client, a former supervisor or a colleague from your community service or extracurricular activities.
Academic recommendations are acceptable but they are less likely to address our main interest, which is to assess your ability to work with and manage others as well as your potential for senior management. If you feel it would add value to your application, you may also upload an optional third letter of recommendation as part of the supporting documents.
It is important to note that your recommenders can submit their online letters to us at their earliest convenience and up to the deadline to which you are applying.
Please ask your referees to complete the recommendation form promptly using the link provided. Email addresses provided must be from professional sources instead of personal email addresses. They can submit their recommendations at any time, even before you submit your application. Referees can save their progress and return to the form later, but once they have submitted their reference, it cannot be edited. You can track their submissions on your dashboard and send reminders to those who have not yet sent their recommendations.
QUESTIONS
- Family Name
- First Name
- Nationality/Passport
- Organization
- Professional Title
- Street
- Town
- Postal Code
- Country
- Telephone
- Competence in his/her field
- Professionalism
- Focus on the task at hand
- Readiness to use opportunities for achievement
- Creativity and resourcefulness
- Intellectual curiosity
- Energy and drive
- Personal integrity
- Ability to work in a team
- Organizational ability
- Oral communication skills
- Written communication skills
- Excellent (top 2%) ; Very good (top 10%) ; Above average (top 25%) ; Average (top 50%) ; Below average (bottom 50%)
INSTRUCTIONS
Please submit two recommendations from individuals who can objectively assess and speak directly about your professional experience and leadership promise.
*Please note: Recommendations are a required part of the Kellogg application and will not be considered complete until received. All recommendations must also be received by the application deadline.
Letters of recommendation provide insight into your experience and accomplishments as a leader through the eyes of someone else.
You’ll need to submit two letters of recommendation for your application to be considered complete. Ideally, one letter should come from a current supervisor or manager. The second should come from someone who can evaluate your professional performance and your managerial/leadership potential (e.g., former supervisor, previous employer, client).
Please choose your recommenders carefully as additional letters of support are neither required nor encouraged.
Current supervisor recommendations
We prefer that one recommendation come from your current supervisor; however, we understand that there are several factors involved in getting a master's degree. So, with that in mind, if you are not submitting a recommendation from a current supervisor, please select one of the following reasons: (select)
QUESTIONS
Recommender information
- First Name
- Last Name
- Organization
- Position/Title
- Industry
- Your relationship to the candidate
- Phone Number
- Country
- City
- State
- Postal Code
- Highest Degree Earned
- Are you a Kellogg Alumnus?
- Have known candidate since:
- Please comment briefly on the context of your interaction with the applicant and their role in your organization. (textbox)
- What has been the candidate’s most significant contribution to your organization? Provide measurable impact if applicable. (textbox)
Leadership assessment
Listed below you will find a section listing some competencies and character traits that contribute to successful leadership. For each item, please select the response corresponding to the behavior that the candidate most typically exhibits. Your candid, honest appraisal of the candidate will be helpful to the Admissions Committee.
Please assess the candidate on the following skills/qualities. (for each skill, select from drop-down menu)
- Results Orientation
- Strategic Orientation
- Team Leadership
- Influence and Collaboration
- Communicating
- Information Seeking
- Developing Others
- Change Leadership
- Respect for Others
- Trustworthiness
Based on your professional experience, how do you rate this candidate compared to their peer group? (select)
If needed, please explain any rankings above. (textbox, 250 characters)
Do you recommend this candidate for Kellogg? (select)
Are you willing to speak with an admissions officer about this candidate? (select)
Should the candidate accept an offer of admission, I understand I may be contacted by Re Vera Services as part of the application verification process, via phone and/or email, to verify authenticity of this letter of recommendation. (please type your full legal name)
Recommendation upload
Please address all of the following questions:
1. Kellogg has a diverse student body and values students who are inclusive and encouraging of others with differing perspectives and backgrounds. Please tell us about a time when you witnessed the candidate living these values. (300 words)
2. How does the candidate’s performance compare to those of other well-qualified individuals in similar roles? Please provide specific examples. (300 words)
3. Describe the most important piece of constructive feedback you have given the candidate. Please detail the circumstances and the applicant’s response. (250 words)
4. (Optional) Is there anything else you would like us to know?
(Upload file)
INSTRUCTIONS
You need to ask someone to act as your referee, this person could be either of the following:
- your current employer (if you don't want to ask your employer to be a referee, a colleague is acceptable)
- someone else who knows you well in a work context, for example a former employer or long-standing client.
After you input your referee's details into the online application form we will send them an email with log-in details for our online reference system. London Business School reserves the right to contact your referee for further information in connection with your application.
QUESTIONS
Confirm contact details
Here are your details, as provided by the applicant. You can check them and make any changes on this page.
- Title
- First name
- Family name
- Job title
- Country
- Organisation
- Address 1
- Address 2
- City
- County / State
- Post code / Zip code
- Telephone number
- Email address
- Are you an alumna/alumnus of London Business School or connected with the institution in any way? If so please tell us which class or who you are connected with.
- Note: Referees of candidates receiving an offer from London Business School will be contacted for verification. In addition, those referees using a free/personal email account (eg Hotmail, Gmail, Yahoo) will be asked to provide an additional proof of identity such as signed headed paper or a business card. This is a routine measure to help prevent fraudulent submissions.
Comments
Please answer the following questions regarding the applicant, making sure to save your work regularly.
As a guideline for completing the reference form you should aim to write no more than 500 words per question. Please note that 500 words is the maximum amount and not a requirement.
1. How do you know the applicant? How long have you known them for? (textbox)
2. What would you say are the applicant's key strengths and talents? (textbox)
3. What would you say are the applicant's key weaknesses or areas for improvement? (textbox)
4. How do the applicant's performance, potential and personal qualities compare to those of other individuals in similar roles? (textbox)
5. What do you think this person might be doing in ten years' time? Why? (textbox)
Ratings
Please rate the applicant, comparing them with other members of his or her peer group, on the qualities listed below using the following scoring system:
1 = High 3 = Average 5 = Low
- Intellectual or academic ability 1 (High) 2 3 4 5 (Low) Not observed
- Quantitative skills 1 (High) 2 3 4 5 (Low) Not observed
- Initiative / ability to take decisions 1 (High) 2 3 4 5 (Low) Not observed
- Problem-solving skills 1 (High) 2 3 4 5 (Low) Not observed
- Organisational skills 1 (High) 2 3 4 5 (Low) Not observed
- Leadership skills 1 (High) 2 3 4 5 (Low) Not observed
- Team skills 1 (High) 2 3 4 5 (Low) Not observed
- Impact / charisma 1 (High) 2 3 4 5 (Low) Not observed
- Self confidence 1 (High) 2 3 4 5 (Low) Not observed
- Self motivation 1 (High) 2 3 4 5 (Low) Not observed
- Spoken English communication skills 1 (High) 2 3 4 5 (Low) Not observed
- Written English communication skills 1 (High) 2 3 4 5 (Low) Not observed
Please indicate your overall recommendation on a five point score from (1) Highly Recommended to (5) Not Recommended
- Recommendation 1 2 3 4 5
Please feel free to elaborate on your recommendation. (textbox)
(Note: If you prefer to submit additional comments in a separate letter, please email this to apply.mba@london.edu.)
INSTRUCTIONS
List one recommender who will complete a reference form in support of your application. Once you click the "Submit Recommendation Request" button below, your recommender will receive an email from ApplyWeb with instructions.
If you are not selecting a direct supervisor as your recommender, please address why in the optional essay.
Please note that a member of the admissions committee or third party vendor may reach out to your recommender to verify their recommendation.
To send the recommendation request email, please click the 'Submit Recommendation Request' button below.
If you change your recommender after the initial invitation has been sent, any future recommendation changes will not be reflected in your application form.
Michigan Ross uses the GMAC Common Recommendation Form, and we require only one recommendation. Select a recommender who can discuss your professional performance and work style; a current or former supervisor is ideal. Alternatives include a client, project manager, or professional mentor.
QUESTIONS
Recommender Information
- Prefix
- First (Given) Name
- Middle Name
- Last (Family) Name/Surname
- Current Organization
- Current Position/Title
- Industry
- Street Address1
- Street Address2
- City
- State/Province
- Postal Code
- Country
- Day Phone Number (Country code, area code, number)
- (Optional) Alternative Email
(If you are using your personal email account for this recommendation, please enter your work email address which may be used as a verification of your identity if the applicant is admitted.) - Context of Relationship
- Nature of Relationship
- How long have you known the applicant?
- During which period of time have you had the most frequent contact with the applicant?
- If you are affiliated with Ross School of Business or University of Michigan, please indicate how.
- Did you use a translator?
Recommendation Form
Using the grid on the second page of this form, please rate the applicant.
In this section, you will find 12 competencies and character traits that contribute to successful leadership. The competencies and character traits are grouped into five categories:
- Achievement
- Influence
- People
- Personal Qualities
- Cognitive Abilities
For each competency, please mark the one button corresponding to the behavior that you have seen the applicant most consistently exhibit. We acknowledge that all applicants have both areas of strength and areas of development. Your candid, honest appraisal will assist in evaluation of the applicant. Please assume that each level builds upon behaviors of the previous level.
Achievement
Initiative
No Basis for Judgement
Reluctant to Take on New Tasks, Waits to Be Told What to Do; Defers to Others
Willing to Step in and Take Action When Required to Do So
Takes Charge Spontaneously When Problem Needs Attention
Volunteers for New Work Challenges; Proactively Puts in Extra Effort to Accomplish Critical or Difficult Tasks
Proactively Seeks High-impact Projects; Steps Up to Challenges Even When Things Are Not Going Well
Results Orientation
No Basis for Judgement
Focuses on Fulfilling Activities at Hand; Unsure How Work Relates to Goals
Takes Actions to Overcome Obstacles to Achieve Goals
Independently Acts to Exceed Goals and Plans for Contingencies
Documents Activities and Outcomes to Learn From Past; Introduces Incremental Improvements to Raise the Effectiveness of Team
Invents New Approaches with Measurably Better Results; Works to Deliver Best-in-class Performance Improvements
Influence
Communication and Professional Impression, Poise and Presence
No basis for judgement
Struggles to Get Point Across; Neglects to Understand Audience's Input or Perspective; Lacks Confidence and Gets Flustered Under Pressure
Works to Get Point Across; Acknowledges Feedback; Reframes Statements When Necessary to Make Them Clearer; Speaks Politely; Remains Composed in Known Circumstances
Present Views Clearly and Logically Structures Content for a Broad Audience; Listens and Responds to Feedback; Prepares in Advance to Appear Confident; Leaves a Positive and Professional Impression; Responds Confidently in Unfamiliar Situations
Uses Tailored Language That Appeals to Specific Groups; Restates What Others Have Said to Check for Understanding; Comes Across as Confident; Responds Rapidly and Strongly to Crisis; Looked to for Advice and Guidance
Structures Content for Senior-level Meetings; Maintains Composure When Challenged; Solicits Opinions and Concerns, Discusses Them Openly and Adjusts Communication; When in Strong Conflict or Crisis, Remains Cool Under Pressure; Channels Strong Emotion Into Positive Action
Influence and Collaboration
No Basis for Judgement
Does Not Seek Input and Perspective of Others
Accepts Input From Others and Engages Them in Problem Solving
Seeks First to Understand Perspectives of Others; Takes Actions to Gain Their Support for Ideas and Initiatives
Uses Tailored Approaches to Connect with Others, Influence, and Achieve Results
Uses Tailored Influence Approaches to Create and Leverage a Network of Strategically Chosen Individuals to Improve Collective Outcomes
People
Respect for Others
No Basis for Judgement
Unwilling to Acknowledge Others' Points of View
Open to Considering Others' Views When Confronted or Offered
Invites Input From Others Because of Expressed Respect for Them and Their Views
Praises People Publicly for Their Good Actions; Ensures That Others' Opinions Are Heard Before Their Own
Uses Empathy and Personal Experience to Resolve Conflicts and Foster Mutual Respect; Reinforces Respect with Public Praise When Individuals Solicit and Use Input From Others
Team Leadership
No Basis for Judgement
Struggles to Delegate Effectively (E.g. Micromanages); Does Not Organize Activities or Provide Appropriate Information to Complete Tasks
Assigns Tasks and Tells People What to Do; Checks When They Are Done
Solicits Ideas and Perspectives From the Team; Structures Activities; Holds Members Accountable
Actively Engages the Team to Develop Plans and Resolve Issues Through Collaboration; Shows the Impact of Individual/team Contributions
Recruits Others Into Duties or Roles Based on Insight Into Individual Abilities; Rewards Those Who Exceed Expectations; Provides Strong Organizational Support
Developing Others
No Basis for Judgement
Focuses Only on One's Own Growth; Critical of Others' Efforts to Develop
Encourages People to Develop; Points Out Mistakes to Help People Develop and Praises Them for Improvements
Gives Specific Positive and Negative Behavioral Feedback to Support the Development of Others
Provides Overarching Practical Guiding Principles and Recommendations That Are Applicable in Multiple Situations to Direct or Focus Efforts on Specific Areas of Development
Identifies Potential in Others; Inspires Others to Develop by Providing Feedback, Mentoring/coaching, and Identifying New Growth Opportunities as Well as Supporting Their Effort to Change
Personal Qualities
Trustworthiness/Integrity
No Basis for Judgement
Follows the Crowd; Takes Path of Least Resistance; Gives in Under Pressure
Acts Consistently with Stated Intentions, Values, or Beliefs When It Is Easy to Do So
Acts Spontaneously and Consistently with Stated Intentions, Values, or Beliefs Despite Opposition
Initiates Actions Based on Values or Beliefs Even Though the Actions May Come with Reputational Risk; Demonstrates the Values of the Team or Organization Publicly
Demonstrates High Personal Integrity Even at Personal Cost; Holds People Accountable to the Team or Organizational Values
Adaptability/Resilience
No Basis for Judgement
Prefers Existing Ways of Doing Things; Fears Failure; Becomes Anxious Under Challenging Situations
Adapts to New Methods and Procedures When Required to Do So; Remains Calm in Unfamiliar Situations Until Confronted with Obstacle
Champions Adoption of New Initiatives and Processes; Exhibits Level-headedness in Most Environments Including Challenging Ones; Persists Until Obstacle Is Overcome
Seeks Out Disruptions as an Opportunity for Improvement; Remains Optimistic and Forward-looking in Difficult Situations That May Result in Failure
Energized by Projects with High Uncertainty but Potential for High Reward; Seeks to Be the First Into Unknown or Unfamiliar Situations; Welcomes Learning Opportunities Created by Failure; Learns From Mistakes and Rebounds Quickly From Setbacks
Self Awareness
No Basis for Judgement
Lacks Awareness of How He/She Is Perceived; Denies or Offers Excuses When Confronted
Acknowledges Fault or Performance Problem When Confronted with Concrete Example or Data
Describes Own Key Strengths and Weaknesses Accurately; Welcomes Feedback From Others and Discusses Opportunities to Change with Select Individuals
Actively Seeks Out Feedback to Explicitly Address Desired Improvement Areas or Build on Strengths; Explores Reasons for Problems Openly, Including Own Faults
Seeks Out Challenging and Potentially Risky Experiences to Improve; Identifies and Engages with Resources-people, Processes, or Content-to Maximize Strengths or Mitigate Weaknesses
Cognitive
Problem Solving
No Basis for Judgement
Avoids Problems; When Faced with Problems, Sticks to What Worked Before, or Chooses an Obvious Path
Offers Solutions When the Risk Is Low; Focuses on Immediate, Short-term Implications Instead of the Big Picture
Looks Beyond the Obvious; Identifies and Focuses on the Critical Information Needed to Understand a Problem, Identifies Root Cause(s), and Comes Up with Reasonable Solutions
Gathers and Analyzes Key Information Using Complex Methods or Several Layers Deep; Integrates Perspectives From a Variety of Sources to Arrive at Unexpected but Practical and Effective Solutions
Applies Logic to Break Complex Problems Down Into Manageable Parts or Sub-problems; Solves Tough and Interconnected Problems and Can Explain How the Pieces Are Connected
Strategic Orientation
No Basis for Judgement
Focuses on Completing Work Without Understanding Implications
Understands Immediate Issues or Implications of Work or Analysis
Develops Insights or Recommendations Within Area of Responsibility That Have Improved Near-Term Business Performance
Develops Insights or Recommendations Within Area of Responsibility That Have Shaped Team/organization Strategy and Will Have Impact on Long-term Business Performance
Develops Insights or Recommendations Beyond Area of Responsibility with Impact on Long-term Business Strategy and Performance
(Optional) Is there anything about your rating on the grid categories which you would like to comment? (textbox)
Based on your professional experience, how do you rate this applicant compared to her/his peer group? (select)
Overall, I (select)
Recommender Questions
Please answer the following questions and provide specific examples where possible.
Evaluative Questions
1. Please provide a brief description of your interaction with the applicant and, if applicable, the applicant's role in your organization. (50 words) (textbox)
2. How does the performance of the applicant compare to that of other well-qualified individuals in similar roles? Please provide specific examples. (E.g. what are the applicant's principal strengths? (500 words) (textbox)
3. Describe the most important piece of constructive feedback you have given the applicant. Please detail the circumstances and the applicant's response. (500 words) (textbox)
4. (Optional) Is there anything else we should know? (textbox)
INSTRUCTIONS
One Letter of Recommendation is required. A detailed recommendation can tell us a lot about you. Make sure you select an individual qualified to speak about your results as a professional and your potential as a leader.
Some important details:
MBA applicants must submit one letter of recommendation.
A recommendation from a professional contact is preferred, ideally a manager or supervisor.
We do not accept recommendations from family members.
Your letter of recommendation must be received by the deadline date for the round you are applying (see above for our deadlines.) It is your responsibility to remind your recommender to make sure it is submitted on time.
You will be instructed to add your recommender's contact information and they will be sent instructions on how to submit their letter.
Additional References
We want to make sure we give you the best chance to show us your strengths, so please provide us with contact information for two additional professional references. If we still have questions after reading your application, we might reach out to one or both of these references. Similar to your recommender, these additional references should be able to speak to your professional and/or academic background. These two individuals should be different from your recommender.
Some important details:
- All MBA applicants must provide contact information for two additional references.
- References should be different from your recommender.
- Please enter the names and contact information (phone and email) for each additional reference as well as where they work and their relationship to you.
- We do not accept references from family members.
- If the Admissions Committee wishes to contact any of your references, we will reach out directly to the reference to set up a mutually convenient time to talk.
QUESTIONS
Recommender Information
- Prefix
- First (Given) Name
- Middle Name
- Last (Family) Name/Surname
- Current Organization
- Current Position/Title
- Address
- Country
- Street
- City
- Postal Code
- Telephone number (including country code)
- Email Address
- (Optional) Alternative email (If you are using your personal email account for this recommendation, please enter your work email address which may be used as a verification of your identity if the applicant is admitted.)
- Context of Relationship
- How long have you known the applicant?
- May we contact you regarding this applicant?
- What is the best way to contact you?
- Occasionally candidates would like to be considered for other MIT programs or partner schools and ask us to share their applications with these programs. Please indicate below if you would like us to share your recommendation.
I authorize MIT Sloan to share my recommendation.
Ratings
Please rate the applicant on the following criteria, in relation to other high potential people you know.
- Truly Exceptional (best in 5 years)
- Outstanding (best in year)
- Above Average (top 25%)
- Average (top 50%)
- Below Average (bottom 50%)
- Unobserved
- Leadership Potential
- Creativity
- Resourcefulness
- Intellectual Curiosity
- Energy and Initiative
- Ability to Work in a Team
- Oral Communication Skills in English Language
- Written Communication Skills in English Language
- Presence
- Analytical Thinking and Reasoning
- Based on your professional experience, how do you rate this candidate compared to their peer group?
- Overall, I …
Recommendation Letter
Please upload a letter or one document that addresses the following questions and cites specific examples or observations about the candidate. Recommendations should be no longer than two pages.
1. How long and in what capacity have you known the applicant?
2. How does the applicant stand out from others in a similar capacity?
3. Please give an example of the applicant's impact on a person, group, or organization.
4. Please give a representative example of how the applicant interacts with other people.
5. Please tell us anything else you think we should know about this applicant.
6. Describe the most important piece of constructive feedback you have given the applicant. Please detail the circumstances and the applicant’s response.
UPLOAD FILE
INSTRUCTIONS
Choosing Your Endorser
You are required to submit one EQ Endorsement with your application. A second EQ Endorsement is optional, but not required.
Your EQ Endorsement must come from your current supervisor. If you cannot include an endorsement from your current supervisor, you must provide an explanation in the online application.
Should you submit a second EQ Endorsement, it may come from someone who knows you professionally and/or personally.
EQ Endorsements should come from individuals who can objectively assess your potential for success in NYU Stern's MBA program and in your future career, and who can act as a persuasive advocate of your EQ strengths.
Immediate family members should not write your EQ endorsement.
Submitting more than two EQ endorsements is not encouraged but is allowed. Please carefully consider whether additional endorsements add significant value and a new and unique perspective to your application.
Your endorsers may answer these questions in the endorsement form or by uploading a Word or PDF document.
EQ endorsements must be submitted online.
If your endorser cannot submit an online endorsement, you must email admchair@stern.nyu.edu to explain the circumstances and request approval for your endorser to submit a paper endorsement.
If your endorser cannot complete an endorsement in English, they will need to follow the instructions above and have the endorsement translated into English through a certified English translation service. Upon submitting the endorsement, your endorser must include the original letter and the translated copy. Applications that only include the translated copy may be made incomplete. Endorsers can upload these documents directly to the application as a single pdf via the link provided, or they may email the original endorsement and translated copy to admchair@stern.nyu.edu to be added to the application. Endorsements can only be accepted directly from the endorser.
You are required to submit one EQ Endorsement. A second EQ Endorsement is optional, but not required.
If you are a reapplicant to NYU Stern's MBA program, you are not required to submit an EQ Endorsement. Your endorsement from the previous cycle that you applied in will be reviewed as a part of your application. Additional EQ endorsements are optional, but not required.
EQ Endorsements should come from individuals who can objectively assess your potential for success in NYU Stern's MBA program and in your future career, and who can act as a persuasive advocate of your EQ strengths. View details on the EQ Endorsement.
The EQ Endorsements should be completed online. Please provide the names and contact information of endorsers below.
Once you have added your endorser information below, an email will be sent to them with instructions on how to proceed with the online endorsement. If you would like to send a reminder email, click the endorser's name below and then click the "Send Reminder" button at the bottom of the box to automatically generate a reminder email.
Make sure to have your endorser allow the stern.nyu.edu domain to ensure receipt of our notification. If your endorser is having difficulty accessing your endorsement using their company email address, have your endorser provide you with their personal email address. Then use that personal email address to create and send a new endorsement request from the application.
For those endorsers who wish to submit their endorsement on paper or who require a translation, you must contact NYU Stern MBA Admissions via email at admchair@stern.nyu.edu for prior approval.
QUESTIONS
EQ Endorsements
- First Name
- Last Name
- Organization
- Title
- Relationship
- Phone Number
- Date Submitted
- Signature
- Is the applicant currently employed by your organization?:
- Are you an alumna/alumnus of the NYU Stern School of Business?
EQ Endorsement
Please rate the applicant in relation to his or her peers. (for each skill, select from drop-down menu: outstanding ; excellent ; good ; average ; below average ; unable to judge)
- Analytical/Quantitative Ability:
- Oral Communication Skills:
- Written Communication Skills:
- Initiative:
- Integrity:
- Leadership:
- Maturity:
- Teamwork:
- Professionalism:
- Emotional Intelligence (EQ):
Please mark your overall recommendation regarding this applicant's admission to NYU Stern: (select)
1. Please provide a brief description of your interaction with the applicant and, if applicable, the applicant's role in your organization. (Up to 50 words) (textbox)
2. How does the applicant's performance compare to that of other well-qualified individuals in similar roles (if applicable)? Please provide specific examples. (E.g. what are the applicant's principal strengths?) (Up to 500 words) (textbox)
3. Describe the most important piece of constructive feedback you have given the applicant. Please detail the circumstances and the applicant's response. (Up to 500 words) (textbox)
4. IQ+EQ is a core value of NYU Stern, and we seek exceptional individuals who possess both intellectual and interpersonal strengths. Emotional intelligence (EQ) skills such as self-awareness, empathy, communication and self-management are at the core of our community of leaders. Please provide one specific and compelling example to demonstrate the applicant's emotional intelligence. (textbox)
5. (Optional) Is there anything else we should know? (textbox)
(upload file)
INSTRUCTIONS
We require two professional or academic references.
Using the online application form you will need to submit two references, preferably from professional referees. Once your referee details are input into the form, your referee will receive an automatic email from the School with details on how to complete the online reference form. Please note we can only accept references from a valid work/professional/institutional email address and not from Gmail/Hotmail accounts.
MBA: you must provide a minimum of two references (at least one professional) using the referee’s professional or institutional email address. References from personal email addresses will not be accepted (@gmail, @yahoo, @hotmail etc.)
QUESTIONS
Evaluation grid
For each skill, select: Needs Improvement ; Developing ; Competent ; Exceeds Expectations ; Unknown/Not Observed
- Intellectual Curiosity
- Leadership skills
- Ability to work in a team
- Energy and drive
- English language ability
Letter
Please upload a letter below, to elaborate on your ratings you have given the candidate above. Please also indicate, for how long you have known the candidate and in what capacity, what are their strengths and weaknesses, and how you think the candidate would benefit from the programme. (upload file)
INSTRUCTIONS
What to submit
This is your chance to let someone else tell us how great you are! Please solicit two letters of recommendation for your MBA application.
One recommendation from your current direct supervisor (or next best alternative) at work
One recommendation from someone else who has supervised your work
Notify your recommenders which type of letter of recommendation they will be completing for you (Current Direct Supervisor or Other) and in which round you will be applying.
We do not allow letters of recommendation from family members and current or former direct reports.
Your recommenders must be the sole authors of your letters of recommendation. Drafting, writing, translating, or submitting your own recommendations, or having any outside party review or edit them, even if asked to do so by a recommender, is a violation of our application terms. You are responsible for informing your recommenders of this policy.
Technical advice: Please ask your recommenders to set their email filters to allow emails from @stanford.edu and @gsb.stanford.edu.
How to submit
Your recommenders are required to submit their letters through our online form by the deadline of the round in which you apply. Register your recommenders by clicking the Add Recommender button below.
Provide the name and contact information of each person who will be recommending you. Check the email address for each recommender carefully. You cannot change it later. If there is an error, Exclude the recommender and add their information again. It is essential that you enter the recommender’s email address correctly so that your recommender can access the instructions and recommendation form.
Read the waiver statement for each letter of recommendation and determine whether or not you will waive your right to review each recommendation. You cannot change this later.
Click on the Send to Recommender button. We will send an email to the recommender with instructions on how to proceed. Check with your recommender to make sure they receive it.
Your recommender completes and submits their recommendation.
You and your recommender receive an email confirming the recommendation has been submitted.
You can check the status of your letters of recommendation anytime by logging in to your application or your applicant status portal once you have submitted your application. Your recommenders must submit their letters of recommendation through an online form. They may not email, mail, or fax letters of recommendation. Both letters of recommendation must be submitted by the deadline of the round in which you apply.
Ready to submit your application? Wait! Read this first.
You will not be able to submit your application until you have notified two recommenders.
You don't have to wait until both letters are in before submitting your application. Go ahead and submit when you are ready, but remember to follow up and make sure your recommenders submit their letters by the deadline.
If a recommender hasn't submitted a letter yet and you would like to remind them, click on the recommender's record and then click Remind Recommender.
If you need to change recommenders after notifying two, you must first exclude a recommender by clicking on their name, then clicking on Exclude. You will then be able to add a new recommender.
Your letters of recommendation should provide specific examples and anecdotes that illustrate what you have done and how you have done it.
We require two letters of recommendation: one recommendation from your current direct supervisor (or next best alternative) at work and one recommendation from someone else who has supervised you. We do not allow letters of recommendation from family members and current or former direct reports.
Both letters of recommendation must be submitted by the deadline of the round in which you apply. You must not have read or had any involvement in the drafting, writing, translation, or submission of the letters, including having any outside party review or edit the letters before they are submitted.
First Recommendation
Current Direct Supervisor or Next Best Alternative
You must obtain at least one recommendation from your current direct supervisor. We understand, however, that you may be in a situation that prevents you from providing a recommendation from your current direct supervisor. For example, you may:
Be self-employed
Work for a family business in which a family member is your supervisor
Have begun a new position where your direct supervisor does not know you well
Have not notified your direct supervisor that you are applying to business school
Be a student
If you are unable to provide a letter from your current direct supervisor, use your judgment in finding an alternative source for your recommendation: a previous supervisor, an indirect manager, a client, a member of your board of directors, or any other individual who supervises your work.
If you don't have full-time work experience, you may use a direct supervisor from a summer, part-time, or internship position. Alternatively, you may ask someone who managed you in an extracurricular, research, volunteer, or community activity.
Second Recommendation
Someone Else Who Has Supervised You
The strongest recommendations typically come from your workplace. You may select a recommendation from your professional, community, or extracurricular experiences. Having two recommendations from the same organization is fine. We recognize that work environments are fluid, so we give you the option of choosing the individual who can best represent your potential impact.
Choosing Your Recommenders
We are impressed by what a recommendation letter says, not by the title or background of the individual who wrote it or the writing skills of the recommender. You should choose individuals who:
Know you well through significant, direct involvement with you within the last three years
Will provide detailed anecdotes and examples to support their assertions
Are sufficiently enthused to spend time writing a thoughtful letter
Deferred Enrollment
If you are currently a full-time student, we encourage you to select recommenders who have supervised your extracurricular activities or work, such as internships or part-time jobs
QUESTIONS
Recommender Information
- First Name (Given)
- Last Name (Family)
- Organization
- Job Title
- Location
- Country
- City
- Phone
May we contact you at work regarding this applicant? Yes/No
Additional Details
How long have you known the applicant? (select)
During which period of time have you had the most frequent contact with the applicant?
From:
To:
You have been registered by the applicant as providing this type of Letter of Recommendation.
Current Direct Supervisor
Other
Are/were you the applicant's direct supervisor?
Yes
No
Comment briefly on the context of your interaction with the applicant. If applicable, describe the applicant's role in your organization. (textbox, 320 characters)
[] I used a translator. (check)If you are a Stanford GSB alumna/alumnus, enter your degree class year. If you are not, leave blank. ___________________
How many candidates are you recommending to Stanford GSB this year? ___________________
Leadership Assessment
Listed below you will find a number of competencies that contribute to successful leadership. Within each category, mark the one button corresponding to the behavior that the candidate most typically exhibits. We acknowledge that all candidates have both areas of strength and areas of development. If you select the highest rating, provide specific examples in your letter.
Initiative
No basis for judgment
Reluctant to take on new tasks; waits to be told what to do; defers to others
Willing to step in and take charge when required to do so
Takes charge spontaneously when problem needs attention
Volunteers for new work challenges; proactively puts in extra effort to accomplish critical or difficult tasks
Proactively seeks high-impact projects; steps up to challenges even when things are not going well
Results Orientation
No basis for judgment
Focuses on fulfilling activities at hand; unsure how work relates to goals
Takes actions to overcome obstacles to achieve goals
Independently acts to exceed goals and plans for contingencies
Documents activities and outcomes to learn from past; introduces incremental improvements to raise the effectiveness of team
Invents new approaches with measurably better results; works to deliver best-in-class performance improvements
Communication, Professional Impression & Poise
No basis for judgment
Struggles to get point across; neglects to understand audience’s input or perspective; lacks confidence and gets flustered under pressure
Works to get point across; acknowledges feedback; reframes statements when necessary to make them clearer; speaks politely; remains composed in known circumstances
Presents views clearly and logically structures content for a broad audience; listens and responds to feedback; prepares in advance to appear confident; leaves a positive and professional impression; responds confidently in unfamiliar situations
Uses tailored language that appeals to specific groups; restates what others have said to check for understanding; comes across as confident; responds rapidly and strongly to crisis; looked to for advice and guidance
Maintains composure when challenged; solicits opinions and concerns, discusses them openly and adjusts communication; when in strong conflict or crisis, remains cool under pressure; channels strong emotion into positive action
Influence and Collaboration
No basis for judgment
Does not seek input and perspective of others
Accepts input from others and engages them in problem solving
Seeks first to understand perspectives of others; takes actions to gain their support for ideas and initiatives
Uses tailored approaches to connect with others, influence, and achieve results
Uses tailored influence approaches to create and leverage a network of strategically chosen individuals to improve collective outcomes
Respect for Others
No basis for judgment
Unwilling to acknowledge others’ points of view
Open to considering others’ views when confronted or offered
Invites input from others because of expressed respect for them and their views
Praises people publicly for their good actions; ensures that others’ opinions are heard before their own
Uses empathy and personal experience to resolve conflicts and foster mutual respect; reinforces respect with public praise when individuals solicit and use input from others
Team Leadership
No basis for judgment
Struggles to delegate effectively (e.g. micromanages); does not organize activities or provide appropriate information to complete tasks
Assigns tasks and tells people what to do; checks when they are done
Solicits ideas and perspectives from the team; structures activities; holds members accountable
Actively engages the team to develop plans and resolve issues through collaboration; shows the impact of individual/team contributions
Recruits others into duties or roles based on insight into individual abilities; rewards those who exceed expectations; provides strong organizational support
Developing Others
No basis for judgment
Focuses only on own growth; critical of others’ efforts to develop
Encourages people to develop; points out mistakes to help people develop and praises them for improvements
Gives specific positive and negative behavioral feedback to support the development of others
Provides overarching practical guiding principles and recommendations that are applicable in multiple situations to direct or focus efforts on specific areas of development
Identifies potential in others; inspires others to develop by providing feedback, mentoring/coaching, and identifying new growth opportunities as well as supporting their effort to change
Trustworthiness/ Integrity
No basis for judgment
Follows the crowd; takes path of least resistance; gives in under pressure
Acts consistently with stated intentions, values, or beliefs when it is easy to do so
Acts spontaneously and consistently with stated intentions, values, or beliefs despite opposition
Initiates actions based on values or beliefs even though the actions may come with reputational risk; demonstrates the values of the team or organization publicly
Demonstrates high personal integrity even at personal cost; holds people accountable to the team or organizational values
Adaptability/ Resilience
No basis for judgment
Prefers existing ways of doing things; fears failure; becomes anxious under challenging situations
Adapts to new methods and procedures when required to do so; remains calm in unfamiliar situations until confronted with obstacle
Champions adoption of new initiatives and processes; exhibits calm in unfamiliar situations until confronted with obstacle
Seeks out disruptions as an opportunity for improvement; remains optimistic and forward-looking in difficult situations that may result in failure
Energized by projects with high uncertainty but potential for high reward; seeks to be the first into unknown or unfamiliar situations; welcomes learning opportunities created by failure; learns from mistakes and rebounds quickly from setbacks
Self Awareness
No basis for judgment
Lacks awareness of how they are perceived; denies or offers excuses when confronted
Acknowledges fault or performance problem when confronted with concrete example or data
Describes own key strengths and weaknesses accurately; welcomes feedback from others and discusses opportunities to change with select individuals
Actively seeks out feedback to explicitly address desired improvement areas or build on strengths; explores reasons for problems openly, including own faults
Seeks out challenging and potentially risky experiences to improve; identifies and engages with resources – people, processes, or content – to maximize strengths or mitigate weaknesses
Problem Solving
No basis for judgment
Avoids problems; when faced with problems, sticks to what worked before, or chooses an obvious path
Offers solutions when the risk is low; focuses on immediate, short-term implications instead of the big picture
Looks beyond the obvious; identifies and focuses on the critical information needed to understand a problem, identifies root cause(s), and comes up with reasonable solutions
Gathers and analyzes key information using complex methods or several layers deep; integrates perspectives from a variety of sources to arrive at unexpected but practical and effective solutions
Applies logic to break complex problems down into manageable parts or sub-problems; solves tough and interconnected problems and can explain how the pieces are connected
Strategic Orientation
No basis for judgment
Focuses on completing work without understanding implications
Understands immediate issues or implications of work or analysis
Develops insights or recommendations within area of responsibility that have improved near-term business performance
Develops insights or recommendations within area of responsibility that have shaped team/organization strategy and will have impact on long-term business performance
Develops insights or recommendations beyond area of responsibility with impact on long-term business strategy and performance
Feel free to comment if you need to clarify the ratings you have assigned. (textbox, 500 characters)
Summary
- Based on your professional experience, how would you rate this candidate compared to their peer group? (select)
- Overall, I (select)
Recommendation Questions
The most helpful recommendations provide detailed descriptions, candid anecdotes, and specific evidence that highlight the candidate's behavior, actions, and impact on those around them. This kind of information helps distinguish the very best individuals from a pool of many well-qualified candidates. Write your answers to the following questions in a separate document and submit it through our online form.
Questions:
1. How does the applicant's performance compare to that of other well-qualified individuals in similar roles? Provide specific examples. – Up to 500 words
2. Describe the most important piece of constructive feedback you have given the applicant. Detail the circumstances and the applicant's response. – Up to 500 words
3. (Optional) Is there anything else we should know?
Do not include graphics or icons such as company letterhead.
Save your recommendation form before uploading your document by clicking on the Save for Later button below. To upload your document:
Click on the Choose File or Browse button.
Locate your document and click on Open in the pop-up window.
Once uploaded, the name of your document will appear to the right of the Choose File or Browse button.
Upload Letter of Recommendation
INSTRUCTIONS
We require one recommendation from a person who has supervised your work and/or assessed your performance. The Admissions Committee limits each application to one letter of recommendation and cannot accept additional recommendations.
While completing your application, you will be able to send your recommender an invitation to submit their recommendation. Professional recommendations are strongly recommended (i.e. direct supervisor, indirect supervisor, or a client). If you are unable to request a letter of recommendation from your direct supervisor or feel that another recommender would be more appropriate, please explain why in your optional essay statement. Once your letter of recommendation is received, you will receive an automated email.
To give us an independent perspective on your application, please provide one recommendation of your professional experience.
Ideally, the person you select should be a recent or current direct supervisor. If you are unable to ask a recent or current direct supervisor for a recommendation, we advise you to select an indirect supervisor or a client for your recommendation. The Admissions Committee is looking for insights from an individual who has a superior knowledge of you as a professional and should speak to your work qualities and career potential.
QUESTIONS
Recommender Information
- First Name
- Last Name
- Email Address
- Phone
- Current Organization
- Current Position/Title
- Industry
- Organization City
- Organization Country
- Context Of Relationship
- Nature Of Relationship
- How long have you known the applicant?
- Degree Earned
- Graduation Month
- Graduation Year
- Did you use a translator?
Recommendation
In this section, you will find 12 competencies and character traits that contribute to successful leadership. The competencies and character traits are grouped into five categories:
– Achievement
– Influence
– People
– Personal Qualities
– Cognitive Abilities
For each competency, please select the one button that corresponds to the behavior that you have seen the applicant most consistently exhibit. We acknowledge that all applicants have both areas of strength and areas of development. Your candid and honest appraisal will assist in evaluation of the applicant. Please assume that each level builds upon behaviors of the previous level.
Achievement
1. Initiative: Acts ahead of need/anticipates problems
No basis for judgment
Reluctant to take on new tasks; waits to be told what to do; defers to others
Willing to step in and take charge when required to do so
Takes charge spontaneously when problem needs attention
Volunteers for new work challenges; proactively puts in extra effort to accomplish critical or difficult tasks
Proactively seeks high-impact projects; steps up to challenges even when things are not going well
2. Results Orientation: Focuses on and drives toward delivering on goals, objectives, and performance improvement
No basis for judgment
Focuses on fulfilling activities at hand; unsure how work relates to goals
Takes actions to overcome obstacles to achieve goals
Independently acts to exceed goals and plans for contingencies
Documents activities and outcomes to learn from past; introduces incremental improvements to raise the effectiveness of team
Invents new approaches with measurably better results; works to deliver best-in-class performance improvements
Influence
3. Communication, Professional Impression & Poise: Delivers messages and ideas in a way that engages an audience and achieves buy-in; uses listening and other attending behaviors to reach shared understanding; remains calm and measured even in time of crisis or conflict
No basis for judgment
Struggles to get point across; neglects to understand audience’s input or perspective; lacks confidence and gets flustered under pressure
Works to get point across; acknowledges feedback; reframes statements when necessary to make them clearer; speaks politely; remains composed in known circumstances
Present views clearly and logically structures content for a broad audience; listens and responds to feedback; prepares in advance to appear confident; leaves a positive and professional impression; responds confidently in unfamiliar situations
Uses tailored language that appeals to specific groups; restates what others have said to check for understanding; comes across as confident; responds rapidly and strongly to crisis; looked to for advice and guidance
Structures content for senior-level meetings; maintains composure when challenged;solicits opinions and concerns, discusses them openly and adjusts communication;remains cool under pressure during conflict or crisis;channels emotion into positive action
4. Influence and Collaboration: Engages and works with people over whom one has no direct control
No basis for judgment
Does not seek input and perspective of others
Accepts input from others and engages them in problem solving
Seeks first to understand perspectives of others; takes actions to gain their support for ideas and initiatives
Uses tailored approaches to connect with others, influence, and achieve results
Uses tailored influence approaches to create and leverage a network of strategically chosen individuals to improve collective outcomes
People
5. Respect for Others: Acknowledges the value of others’ views and actions
No basis for judgment
Unwilling to acknowledge others’ points of view
Open to considering others’ views when confronted or offered
Invites input from others because of expressed respect for them and their views
Praises people publicly for their good actions; ensures that others’ opinions are heard before their own
Uses empathy and personal experience to resolve conflicts and foster mutual respect; reinforces respect with public praise when individuals solicit and use input from others
6. Team Leadership: Manages and empowers a team of formal or informal direct reports, including virtual teams
No basis for judgment
Struggles to delegate effectively (e.g. micromanages); does not organize activities or provide appropriate information to complete tasks
Assigns tasks and tells people what to do; checks when they are done
Solicits ideas and perspectives from the team; structures activities; holds members accountable
Actively engages the team to develop plans and resolve issues through collaboration; shows the impact of individual/team contributions
Recruits others into duties or roles based on insight into individual abilities; rewards those who exceed expectations; provides strong organizational support
7. Developing Others: Helps people develop their performance and ability over time
No basis for judgment
Focuses only on one’s own growth; critical of others’ efforts to develop
Encourages people to develop; points out mistakes to help people develop and praises them for improvements
Gives specific positive and negative behavioral feedback to support the development of others
Provides overarching practical guiding principles and recommendations that are applicable in multiple situations to direct or focus efforts on specific areas of development
Identifies potential in others; inspires others to develop by providing feedback, mentoring/coaching, and identifying new growth opportunities as well as supporting their effort to change
Personal Qualities
8. Trustworthiness/ Integrity: Acts consistently in line with or follows explicit values, beliefs or intentions
No basis for judgment
Follows the crowd; takes path of least resistance; gives in under pressure
Acts consistently with stated intentions, values, or beliefs when it is easy to do so
Acts spontaneously and consistently with stated intentions, values, or beliefs despite opposition
Initiates actions based on values or beliefs even though the actions may come with reputational risk; demonstrates the values of the team or organization publicly
Demonstrates high personal integrity even at personal cost; holds people accountable to the team or organizational values
9. Adaptability/ Resilience: Adapts to changing demands and circumstances without difficulty. Maintains calm optimism in the face of challenge, problems, or apparent failure
No basis for judgment
Prefers existing ways of doing things; fears failure; becomes anxious under challenging situations
Adapts to new methods and procedures when required to do so; remains calm in unfamiliar situations until confronted with obstacle
Champions adoption of new initiatives and processes; exhibits level-headedness in most environments including challenging ones; persists until obstacle is overcome
Seeks out disruptions as an opportunity for improvement; remains optimistic and forward-looking in difficult situations that may result in failure
Energized by projects with high uncertainty but potential for high reward; seeks to be the first into unknown or unfamiliar situations; welcomes learning opportunities created by failure; learns from mistakes and rebounds quickly from setbacks
10. Self Awareness: Aware of and seeks out additional input on own strengths and weaknesses
No basis for judgment
Lacks awareness of how he/she is perceived; denies or offers excuses when confronted
Acknowledges fault or performance problem when confronted with concrete example or data
Describes own key strengths and weaknesses accurately; welcomes feedback from others and discusses opportunities to change with select individuals
Actively seeks out feedback to explicitly address desired improvement areas or build on strengths; explores reasons for problems openly, including own faults
Seeks out challenging and potentially risky experiences to improve; identifies and engages with resources—people, processes, or content—to maximize strengths or mitigate weaknesses
Cognitive
11. Problem Solving: Frames problems, analyzes situations, identifies key issues, conducts analysis on the issues, and produces acceptable solution
No basis for judgment
Avoids problems; when faced with problems, sticks to what worked before, or chooses an obvious path
Offers solutions when the risk is low; focuses on immediate, short-term implications instead of the big picture
Looks beyond the obvious; identifies and focuses on the critical information needed to understand a problem, identifies root cause(s), and comes up with reasonable solutions
Gathers and analyzes key information using complex methods or several layers deep; integrates perspectives from a variety of sources to arrive at unexpected but practical and effective solutions
Applies logic to break complex problems down into manageable parts or sub-problems; solves tough and interconnected problems and can explain how the pieces are connected
12. Strategic Orientation: Thinks beyond one’s span of control and into the future to reshape the approach or scope of work
No basis for judgment
Focuses on completing work without understanding implications
Understands immediate issues or implications of work or analysis
Develops insights or recommendations within area of responsibility that have improved near-term business performance
Develops insights or recommendations within area of responsibility that have shaped team/organization strategy and will have impact on long-term business performance
Develops insights or recommendations beyond area of responsibility with impact on long-term business strategy and performance
(Optional) Is there anything about your competency ratings on which you'd like to comment? (textbox)
Based on your professional experience, how do you rate this candidate compared to her/his peer group? (select)
Overall, I … (select)
Additional Questions
Please answer the following questions and provide specific examples where possible.
1. Please provide a brief description of your interaction with the applicant and, if applicable, the applicant’s role in your organization. (Recommended word count: 50 words) (textbox)
2. Describe the most important piece of constructive feedback you have given the applicant. Please detail the circumstances and the applicant’s response. (Recommended word count: 500 words) (textbox)
3. How does the performance of the applicant compare to that of other well-qualified individuals in similar roles? (E.g. what are the applicant’s principal strengths?) (Recommended word count: 500 words) (textbox)
(Optional) Is there anything else we should know? If so, please upload a pdf file. (upload file)
INSTRUCTIONS
You must submit two LORs unless you are a reapplicant who applied during the most recent admissions cycle. Reapplicants who applied during the most recent admissions cycle need to submit only one new LOR from a reference who did not write to Tuck on their behalf last year.
Details
In the application, you will be asked to enter your reference’s information. We will email each reference a unique link to our LOR form. All LORs must be submitted virtually by your reference(s) via this process.
References who cannot write in English should write in their native language and have the LOR translated by an outside translation service. Do not translate the LOR into English for your reference.
Your reference must be the sole author of your LOR. Drafting, writing, translating, or submitting your own LOR, even if asked to do so by your reference, violates Tuck’s admissions policies and Academic Honor Principle. You are responsible for informing your references of this policy.
You are also responsible for notifying your references of your application deadline and ensuring your LORs are submitted on time. We review your application only if all required LORs are received by your application deadline. Otherwise, we will move your application to the next admission round. If your application is not complete by the final deadline it will be evaluated as is. If you would like to make changes to your list of references, please contact us.
Selecting Your References
Request LORs from people who can demonstrate that you are smart, accomplished, aware, and encouraging.
If possible, your current direct supervisor should write one of your LORs. You will be asked to provide a brief explanation in the Other Employment Information section of your application if you cannot provide an LOR from a direct supervisor. If more than a brief explanation of recommender choice is needed, you may further clarify your choice with a few sentences in the Optional Information section of the application.
LORs from professors who did not supervise professional work, from friends, family members, or coaches, do not enhance your candidacy.
First time applicants must submit two letters of reference (LOR). Reapplicants who applied in the 2023-24 application cycle need to submit only one new LOR from a reference who did not previously write to Tuck on their behalf.
For suggestions on selecting and preparing your references, read our guidance on the Tuck360 blog.
QUESTIONS
Section 1: Reference Information
- First Name
- Last Name
- Telephone
- Relationship to Applicant
- Education
- Highest Degree Earned
- Granting Institution
- Organization
- Position/Title
- Organization Location
- Country
- City
- State
Section 2: Recommendation Questions
Tuck has adopted the essay questions posed by the Graduate Management Admission Council (GMAC) Common Letter of Recommendation. Respond to all of the following questions in the space below. If you have written your reference letter in a Word document, please copy and paste your letter into the space below.
1. Provide a brief description of your interaction with the applicant and, if applicable, the applicant's role in your organization.
2. How does the applicant's performance compare to that of other well-qualified individuals in similar roles? Provide specific examples.
3. Describe the most important piece of constructive feedback you have given the applicant. Please detail the circumstances and the applicant's response.
4. Is there anything else we should know?
(textbox, no limit)
INSTRUCTIONS
Here are the how, who, what, where, when and why of recommendations:
How & How Many: Fill out the details within the Recommenders section below. Two recommendations are required for new applicants and one new recommendation is required for reapplicants (you may ask an individual who submitted a recommendation for you in a prior year to submit a new one). If you need to change your recommender or their e-mail, click “Exclude” (warning: recommender will lose all information already entered) and re-enter via Add Recommender.
Who: Choose recommenders who can speak to your work performance, capabilities, and potential for graduate studies and future career success. Use your best judgment on whom to ask for a recommendation — direct supervisors are generally preferred, and other options could include current or past supervisors/managers, professional colleagues, and clients (peers, family members, and professors are generally not good selections).
What: The recommendation form asks recommenders to evaluate your strengths and areas of growth, plus rate you across a variety of metrics. You can see a sample form here.
Where: Recommendation forms can only be sent and received electronically so your recommender must have a valid e-mail address.
When: Recommendations should be submitted by the round deadline in which you are applying, and it is your responsibility to ensure we receive recommendations in time. To send a reminder to a recommender, click on the Edit link next to their name and then click the Send Reminder button at the bottom of the pop-up screen. We encourage you to contact your recommenders as soon as possible to give them sufficient time (the recommender’s access code is valid for 180 days from the date you save their information).
Why: We are interested in learning more about your professional past performance, future potential, and overall fit from individuals who have worked closely with you.
QUESTIONS
Recommender Information
- First (Given) Name
- Last (Family) Name/Surname
- Current Organization
- Current Position/Title
- Industry
- Telephone number (including country code)
- Email Address
- Alternative E-mail: If you are using your personal email account for this recommendation, please enter your work email address which may be used as a verification of your identity if the applicant is admitted. If the recommendation request was sent to your professional email account, please indicate N/A on this field.
- Context of Relationship
- Recommender's relationship to applicant
- How long have you known the applicant?
- During which period of time have you had the most frequent contact with the applicant?
- If you are affiliated with UCLA, please select the option that most closely matches.
Competency Ratings
For each one, select: No Basis ; Below Average ; Average (top 50%) ; Good (top 25%) ; Excellent (top 10%)
- Interpersonal Skills
- Professional Maturity
- Resilience
- Self-Confidence
- Communication
- Analytical & Problem-Solving
- Motivation & Initiative
- Work Quality
- Teamwork
- Leadership Potential
Is there anything about your competency ratings on which you would like to comment? (optional) (textbox)
Comments and Examples
Please answer the following questions and provide specific examples where possible.
1. Please provide a brief description of your interaction with the applicant and, if applicable, the applicant’s role in your organization. (textbox, Recommended word count: 50 words)
2. How does the performance of the applicant compare to that of other well-qualified individuals in similar roles?
e.g., what are the applicant’s principal strengths? (textbox, Recommended word count: 300 words)
3. Describe the most important piece of constructive feedback you have given the applicant. Please detail the circumstances and the applicant’s response. (textbox, Recommended word count: 300 words)
4. Is there anything else we should know? (optional)
Upload file, Or, type or copy-and-paste your document here: (textbox)
Based on your professional experience, how do you rate this candidate compared to their peer group? (select)
Overall, I … (select)
INSTRUCTIONS
The Admissions Committee requires one professional letter of recommendation, preferably from a supervisor (past or present) or someone who can speak to your strengths at work. If you do not have full-time post-graduate work experience, we will accept one academic recommendation or one professional recommendation (from part-time or summer work experience).
UNC Kenan-Flagler’s Full-Time MBA program utilizes the Graduate Management Admissions Council (GMAC) Common Letter of Recommendation. In your application, you will designate your recommender(s). An e-mail will be sent automatically to the recommender(s) with specific instructions and a link to the recommendation form.
We permit a 10-business day grace period past the deadline for recommendations to be received, but please note that this will delay the processing of your application.
Optional – You may provide only one additional endorsement letter to support your application from a colleague, faculty member, UNC alumni, or current MBA student.
QUESTIONS
Section 1 – Recommender Information
- Prefix
- First (Given) Name
- Middle Name
- Last (Family) Name/Surname
- Current Organization
- Current Position/Title
- Industry
- Address
- Country
- Street
- City
- Postal Code
- Telephone number (including country code)
- Email Address
- (Optional) Alternative email (If you are using your personal email account for this recommendation, please enter your work email address which may be used as a verification of your identity if the applicant is admitted.)
- Context of Relationship
- Nature of relationship
- How long have you known the applicant?
- During which period of time have you had the most frequent contact with the applicant?
- If you are affiliated with the UNC Kenan-Flagler Business School or The University of North Carolina Chapel Hill please select the option that most closely matches.
- May we contact you regarding this applicant?
- Did you use a translator?
Section 2
In this section, you will find 12 competencies and character traits that contribute to successful leadership. The competencies and character traits are grouped into five categories:
– Achievement
– Influence
– People
– Personal Qualities
– Cognitive Abilities
For each competency, please select the one button that corresponds to the behavior that you have seen the applicant most consistently exhibit. We acknowledge that all applicants have both areas of strength and areas of development. Your candid and honest appraisal will assist in evaluation of the applicant. Please assume that each level builds upon behaviors of the previous level.
Achievement
1. Initiative: Acts ahead of need/anticipates problems
No basis for judgment
(1) Reluctant to take on new tasks; waits to be told what to do; defers to others
(2) Willing to step in and take charge when required to do so
(3) Takes charge spontaneously when problem needs attention
(4) Volunteers for new work challenges; proactively puts in extra effort to accomplish critical or difficult tasks
(5) Proactively seeks high-impact projects; steps up to challenges even when things are not going well
2. Results Orientation: Focuses on and drives toward delivering on goals, objectives, and performance improvement
No basis for judgment
(1) Focuses on fulfilling activities at hand; unsure how work relates to goals
(2) Takes actions to overcome obstacles to achieve goals
(3) Independently acts to exceed goals and plans for contingencies
(4) Documents activities and outcomes to learn from past; introduces incremental improvements to raise the effectiveness of team
(5) Invents new approaches with measurably better results; works to deliver best-in-class performance improvements
Influence
3. Communication, Professional Impression & Poise: Delivers messages and ideas in a way that engages an audience and achieves buy-in; uses listening and other attending behaviors to reach shared understanding; remains calm and measured even in time of crisis or conflict
No basis for judgment
(1) Struggles to get point across; neglects to understand audience’s input or perspective; lacks confidence and gets flustered under pressure
(2) Works to get point across; acknowledges feedback; reframes statements when necessary to make them clearer; speaks politely; remains composed in known circumstances
(3) Present views clearly and logically structures content for a broad audience; listens and responds to feedback; prepares in advance to appear confident; leaves a positive and professional impression; responds confidently in unfamiliar situations
(4) Uses tailored language that appeals to specific groups; restates what others have said to check for understanding; comes across as confident; responds rapidly and strongly to crisis; looked to for advice and guidance
(5) Structures content for senior-level meetings; maintains composure when challenged; solicits opinions and concerns, discusses them openly and adjusts communication; remains cool under pressure during conflict or crisis; channels emotion into positive action
4. Influence and Collaboration: Engages and works with people over whom one has no direct control
No basis for judgment
(1) Does not seek input and perspective of others
(2) Accepts input from others and engages them in problem solving
(3) Seeks first to understand perspectives of others; takes actions to gain their support for ideas and initiatives
(4) Uses tailored approaches to connect with others, influence, and achieve results
(5) Uses tailored influence approaches to create and leverage a network of strategically chosen individuals to improve collective outcomes
People
5. Respect for Others: Acknowledges the value of others’ views and actions
No basis for judgment
(1) Unwilling to acknowledge others’ points of view
(2) Open to considering others’ views when confronted or offered
(3) Invites input from others because of expressed respect for them and their views
(4) Praises people publicly for their good actions; ensures that others’ opinions are heard before their own
(5) Uses empathy and personal experience to resolve conflicts and foster mutual respect; reinforces respect with public praise when individuals solicit and use input from others
6. Team Leadership: Manages and empowers a team of formal or informal direct reports, including virtual teams
No basis for judgment
(1) Struggles to delegate effectively (e.g. micromanages); does not organize activities or provide appropriate information to complete tasks
(2) Assigns tasks and tells people what to do; checks when they are done
(3) Solicits ideas and perspectives from the team; structures activities; holds members accountable
(4) Actively engages the team to develop plans and resolve issues through collaboration; shows the impact of individual/team contributions
(5) Recruits others into duties or roles based on insight into individual abilities; rewards those who exceed expectations; provides strong organizational support
7. Developing Others: Helps people develop their performance and ability over time
No basis for judgment
(1) Focuses only on one’s own growth; critical of others’ efforts to develop
(2) Encourages people to develop; points out mistakes to help people develop and praises them for improvements
(3) Gives specific positive and negative behavioral feedback to support the development of others
(4) Provides overarching practical guiding principles and recommendations that are applicable in multiple situations to direct or focus efforts on specific areas of development
(5) Identifies potential in others; inspires others to develop by providing feedback, mentoring/coaching, and identifying new growth opportunities as well as supporting their effort to change
Personal Qualities
8. Trustworthiness/ Integrity: Acts consistently in line with or follows explicit values, beliefs or intentions
No basis for judgment
(1) Follows the crowd; takes path of least resistance; gives in under pressure
(2) Acts consistently with stated intentions, values, or beliefs when it is easy to do so
(3) Acts spontaneously and consistently with stated intentions, values, or beliefs despite opposition
(4) Initiates actions based on values or beliefs even though the actions may come with reputational risk; demonstrates the values of the team or organization publicly
(5) Demonstrates high personal integrity even at personal cost; holds people accountable to the team or organizational values
9. Adaptability/ Resilience: Adapts to changing demands and circumstances without difficulty. Maintains calm optimism in the face of challenge, problems, or apparent failure
No basis for judgment
(1) Prefers existing ways of doing things; fears failure; becomes anxious under challenging situations
(2) Adapts to new methods and procedures when required to do so; remains calm in unfamiliar situations until confronted with obstacle
(3) Champions adoption of new initiatives and processes; exhibits level-headedness in most environments including challenging ones; persists until obstacle is overcome
(4) Seeks out disruptions as an opportunity for improvement; remains optimistic and forward-looking in difficult situations that may result in failure
(5) Energized by projects with high uncertainty but potential for high reward; seeks to be the first into unknown or unfamiliar situations; welcomes learning opportunities created by failure; learns from mistakes and rebounds quickly from setbacks
10. Self Awareness: Aware of and seeks out additional input on own strengths and weaknesses
No basis for judgment
(1) Lacks awareness of how he/she is perceived; denies or offers excuses when confronted
(2) Acknowledges fault or performance problem when confronted with concrete example or data
(3) Describes own key strengths and weaknesses accurately; welcomes feedback from others and discusses opportunities to change with select individuals
(4) Actively seeks out feedback to explicitly address desired improvement areas or build on strengths; explores reasons for problems openly, including own faults
(5) Seeks out challenging and potentially risky experiences to improve; identifies and engages with resources—people, processes, or content—to maximize strengths or mitigate weaknesses
Cognitive
11. Problem Solving: Frames problems, analyzes situations, identifies key issues, conducts analysis on the issues, and produces acceptable solution
No basis for judgment
(1) Avoids problems; when faced with problems, sticks to what worked before, or chooses an obvious path
(2) Offers solutions when the risk is low; focuses on immediate, short-term implications instead of the big picture
(3) Looks beyond the obvious; identifies and focuses on the critical information needed to understand a problem, identifies root cause(s), and comes up with reasonable solutions
(4) Gathers and analyzes key information using complex methods or several layers deep; integrates perspectives from a variety of sources to arrive at unexpected but practical and effective solutions
(5) Applies logic to break complex problems down into manageable parts or sub-problems; solves tough and interconnected problems and can explain how the pieces are connected
12. Strategic Orientation: Thinks beyond one’s span of control and into the future to reshape the approach or scope of work
No basis for judgment
(1) Focuses on completing work without understanding implications
(2) Understands immediate issues or implications of work or analysis
(3) Develops insights or recommendations within area of responsibility that have improved near-term business performance
(4) Develops insights or recommendations within area of responsibility that have shaped team/organization strategy and will have impact on long-term business performance
(5) Develops insights or recommendations beyond area of responsibility with impact on long-term business strategy and performance
(Optional) Is there anything about your competency ratings on which you'd like to comment? (textbox)
Based on your professional experience, how do you rate this candidate compared to her/his peer group? (select)
Overall, I … (select)
Section 3
Please answer the following questions and provide specific examples where possible.
1. Please provide a brief description of your interaction with the applicant and, if applicable, the applicant’s role in your organization. (Recommended word count: 50 words) (textbox)
2. How does the performance of the applicant compare to that of other well-qualified individuals in similar roles? (E.g. what are the applicant’s principal strengths?) (Recommended word count: 500 words) (textbox)
3. Describe the most important piece of constructive feedback you have given the applicant. Please detail the circumstances and the applicant’s response. (Recommended word count: 500 words) (textbox)
4. (Optional) Is there anything else we should know?
Upload file, Or, type or copy-and-paste your document here: (textbox)
Instructions
The recommendation is an opportunity for us to hear from someone other than you regarding your candidacy. The recommendation is the one part of your application you will not fill out yourself. Recommendations are typically the slowest part of the application process, so identify your recommenders well in advance of your target deadline.
Identifying Your Recommender:
We require one recommendation as part of our application process. You may include a second recommendation with your materials, if desired. However, you will want to be sure this additional recommender is offering new insights regarding you and your candidacy.
Consider choosing someone who knows you well and has supervised you in a professional setting and directly observed your work (typically within the last few years). Identify someone who will help us learn more about your accomplishments and leadership potential through specific examples and anecdotes. Strictly academic recommendations are typically less helpful in our evaluation.
Our recommendation process is completely electronic, and your recommenders will fill out two pieces of information — a ratings grid in which they will evaluate you across a set of competencies and a series of short answer questions.
About the Recommendation Process:
Once you enter your recommender’s information and contact details, they will receive an email with a link to our recommendation materials. Occasionally, this email gets caught in a spam filter and does not reach the recommender. In this situation, simply contact our Admissions team (darden@virginia.edu) and we will re-send the recommendation link to your recommender.
Our recommendation process is completely electronic, and your recommendation will automatically associate with your application once the recommendation is submitted. In other words, once you have finished your portion of the application, you may go ahead and submit your materials. However, once you have submitted your application, you will be unable to edit your application or enter additional recommender information.
We find that most recommenders are deadline-oriented, so be sure to stay in touch to make sure they know your application timing. You will receive an email notification once your recommender submits their recommendation. You will also notice a green check mark next to their name and information on your Application Status page (a red “X” will display if the recommendation is still pending).
Please provide one recommendation from an individual you believe can speak directly to your aptitude and capabilities for graduate study and future success as a manager. You may submit up to two recommenders, if desired. We encourage you to let your recommendation writer know about your interest in Darden and remind them of your accomplishments but you should not participate in the writing of your letters.
Choose a recommender who knows you well, has directly observed your work (ideally within the last few years), and who will take the time to write a thorough, detailed document with specific anecdotes and examples. Strictly academic recommendations are generally less helpful in our evaluation. The Admissions Committee focuses on the content of the recommendation, not on the title/position of the individual who provides it (i.e., we strongly prefer comments from a direct manager as opposed to comments from a more senior individual who has little firsthand knowledge of you).
When you enter your recommender's contact information, you will be asked to confirm that you did not write any portion of the recommendation, either in whole or in part, or have any involvement in its drafting or submission.
We prefer that you use your recommender's institutional or corporate email address however we understand that your recommender may prefer to use a personal email address. Submissions from email addresses such as Gmail, Hotmail, and Yahoo may be subject to additional review. Please tell your recommender(s) to set their email filters to allow emails from "@darden.virginia.edu".
We have found that emails sent to certain organizations such as some government agencies and consulting firms will be blocked. You can submit a personal email address for your recommender if necessary.
Recommendations that require conversion to English should be translated by a Certified Translation Service.
If you applied in a previous application period, you are required to submit a new recommendation from an individual who can speak to your professional and personal development since your last application.
Contact your recommender(s) now! The most common reason an application is incomplete and/or misses a deadline is because we have not received at least one recommendation.
QUESTIONS
Section 1 – Recommender Information
- Prefix
- First (Given) Name
- Middle Name
- Last (Family) Name/Surname
- Current Organization
- Current Position/Title
- Industry
- Address
- Country
- Street
- City
- State
- Postal Code
- Telephone number (including country code)
- Email Address
- (Optional) Alternative email (If you are using your personal email account for this recommendation, please enter your work email address which may be used as a verification of your identity if the applicant is admitted.)
- Context of Relationship
- Nature of relationship
- How long have you known the applicant?
- During which period of time have you had the most frequent contact with the applicant?
- Please select the option(s) that most closely matches your affiliation with Darden or the University of Virginia, if one exists.
- May we contact you regarding this applicant?
- Did you use a translator?
Section 2
In this section, you will find 12 competencies and character traits that contribute to successful leadership. The competencies and character traits are grouped into five categories:
– Achievement
– Influence
– People
– Personal Qualities
– Cognitive Abilities
For each competency, please highlight the selection that corresponds to the behavior that you have seen the applicant most consistently exhibit. We acknowledge that all applicants have both areas of strength and areas of development. Your candid and honest appraisal will assist in evaluating the applicant. Please assume that each level builds upon behaviors of the previous level.
Achievement
1. Initiative: Acts ahead of need/anticipates problems
2. Results Orientation: Focuses on and drives toward delivering on goals, objectives, and performance improvement
Influence
3. Communication, Professional Impression & Poise: Delivers messages and ideas in a way that engages an audience and achieves buy-in; uses listening and other attending behaviors to reach shared understanding; remains calm and measured even in time of crisis or conflict
4. Influence and Collaboration: Engages and works with people over whom one has no direct control
People
5. Respect for Others: Acknowledges the value of others’ views and actions
6. Team Leadership: Manages and empowers a team of formal or informal direct reports, including virtual teams
7. Developing Others: Helps people develop their performance and ability over time
Personal Qualities
8. Trustworthiness/ Integrity: Acts consistently in line with or follows explicit values, beliefs or intentions
9. Adaptability/ Resilience: Adapts to changing demands and circumstances without difficulty. Maintains calm optimism in the face of challenge, problems, or apparent failure
10. Self Awareness: Aware of and seeks out additional input on own strengths and weaknesses
Cognitive
11. Problem Solving: Frames problems, analyzes situations, identifies key issues, conducts analysis on the issues, and produces acceptable solution
12. Strategic Orientation: Thinks beyond one’s span of control and into the future to reshape the approach or scope of work
(Optional) Is there anything about your competency ratings on which you would like to comment? (textbox)
Based on your professional experience, how do you rate this candidate compared to her/his peer group? (select)
Overall, I … (select)
Section 3
Please answer the following questions and provide specific examples where possible.
1. How would you characterize your relationship with the applicant and, if applicable, the applicant’s role in your organization? (Word limit: 50 words) (textbox)
2. How does the performance of the applicant compare to that of other well-qualified individuals in similar roles? (E.g. what are the applicant’s principal strengths?) (Recommended word count: 500 words) (textbox)
3. Describe the most important piece of constructive feedback you have given the applicant. Please detail the circumstances and the applicant’s response. (Recommended word count: 500 words) (textbox)
4. (Optional) Is there anything else we should know?
Upload file, Or, type or copy-and-paste your document here: (textbox)
INSTRUCTIONS
We require two letters of recommendations from individuals who are well acquainted with your performance in a work setting, preferably from a current or former supervisor.
The title or position of the evaluator is not as important as his/her ability to comment knowledgeably and specifically about you. Submit recommendations from people who can speak directly about your aptitudes and capabilities.
Go to the Recommender section of the MBA Application Instructions to see the questions asked of recommenders and for more details.
It is possible that after having selected your recommenders, to alter this selection. If the recommender has not submitted a recommendation, you can change the recommender by clicking the Manage your Recommenders' button below. You cannot change a recommender once he/she has completed and submitted their recommendation.
Please also note that this page cannot be updated directly and will not reflect any changes made to the recommender's name or email address on the activities page. However this system will capture the updated information as well as send an email to the new recommender if the email address is updated.
The people submitting reference letters on your behalf should submit their letters to our admissions office electronically through our application system.
You must enter the names and contact information for each recommendation provider.
Admissions committees rely heavily upon confidential appraisals of the applicant's preparation and readiness for graduate school. Waiving the right to access your letters of recommendation provides a positive signal of your confidence to the committees. It is your responsibility to determine whether the recommenders you choose will provide you with strong recommendations. The University of Pennsylvania does not share letters of recommendation, confidential or not, with applicants under any circumstances.
QUESTIONS
Recommender Information
- Prefix
- Last Name/Family Name
- First Name/Given Name
- Suffix
- Title
- Employer
- Street 1
- Street 2
- City
- Country
- US State or Territory/Canadian Province
- Postal Code
- Professional Email
- Phone
- Relationship With Applicant ____________________(Please answer this question accurately (e.g., direct supervisor, indirect supervisor, colleague, peer, mentor). Deliberate misrepresentation of recommender-applicant relationship may jeopardize any offer of admission to the applicant.)
- During which period of time have you had the most frequent contact with the applicant? From ____ To _____
- Are you a graduate of Wharton or any other University of Pennsylvania school? Yes No
- Are you a faculty member of Wharton or any other University of Pennsylvania School? Yes No
Summary Appraisal
Please look at this list of personality characteristics and choose up to two traits that you feel best represent the candidate you are recommending to the Wharton MBA Program. (TIP – You do not have to choose two, only up to two.)
Determined, Humble, Disciplined, Engaged, Intellectually Curious,Analytical, Flexible, Persistent, Conscientious, Results Oriented
1 (select)
2 (select)
Please look at this list of personality characteristics and choose up to two traits that you feel best represent the candidate you are recommending to the Wharton MBA Program. (TIP – You do not have to choose two, only up to two.)
Collaborative, Persuasive, Innovative, Confident, Self-Aware, Professional, Resilient, Energetic, Emotionally Stable, Agreeable
1 (select)
2 (select)
Applicant Assessment
1. Please provide example(s) that illustrate why you believe this candidate will find success in the Wharton MBA classroom. (textbox, Word count: 300)
2. Please provide example(s) that illustrate why you believe this candidate will find success throughout their career. (textbox, Word count: 300)
3. (Optional) Is there anything else we should know? (textbox, 300 words)
INSTRUCTIONS
Why We’re Asking
Recommendations are an important window into understanding your professional impact and how you lead and collaborate within an organizational setting. They are a way for us to gain additional perspective on your candidacy from people who have worked with you and who know you well.
Who Should Write Your Recommendations
Unless you are applying as an undergraduate student, your two recommendations should be professional in nature. We strongly recommend that one of your recommendations come from a current supervisor. However, we know that sometimes this is not possible, and you will have an opportunity to explain your choice of recommenders in the Work Experience section if neither of your recommendations comes from someone who currently supervises you.
Undergraduate students applying to the Silver Scholars Program must provide one letter from an academic instructor and one letter from a professional experience. More detail can be found here.
While all letters must be written in English, we encourage you to find recommenders who can best speak to your past experiences, regardless of their English language fluency. We will evaluate only the substance of the recommendations, not the proficiency of the language used therein. Your recommenders may choose to write their letters in English or to write in their native language and use one of many free translation programs available.
Once you have entered the required recommender information, click the "Send to Recommender" button to email the online recommendation form to your recommender.
To ensure the objectivity and independence of your recommendations, the written product must be entirely the work of your recommenders. Although you may discuss the recommendations with them, you may not have any involvement in drafting or submitting your letters of recommendation. We know that your recommenders are busy, and they may ask your assistance in drafting a letter for their review. Please resist this pressure and ask someone else instead. An authentic letter coming from an individual who is familiar with your work will always be the better option than a letter that was not wholly written by an independent source, even if that person is your current supervisor.
QUESTIONS
Recommender Information
- First (Given) Name
- Middle Name
- Last (Family) Name/Surname
- Current Organization
- Current Position/Title
- Address
- Country
- Street
- City
- State
- Postal Code
- Telephone number (including country code)
- Email Address
- Did you graduate from the Yale School of Management?
- Context of Relationship
- Nature of relationship
- Did you use a translator or translation program?
Leadership Assessment
In this section, you will find 12 competencies and character traits that contribute to successful leadership. The competencies and character traits are grouped into five categories:
– Achievement
– Influence
– People
– Personal Qualities
– Cognitive Abilities
For each competency, please select the one button that corresponds to the behavior that you have seen the applicant most consistently exhibit. We acknowledge that all applicants have both areas of strength and areas of development. Your candid and honest appraisal will assist in evaluation of the applicant. Please assume that each level builds upon behaviors of the previous level.
Achievement
1. Initiative: Acts ahead of need/anticipates problems
No basis for judgment
Reluctant to take on new tasks; waits to be told what to do; defers to others
Willing to step in and take charge when required to do so
Takes charge spontaneously when problem needs attention
Volunteers for new work challenges; proactively puts in extra effort to accomplish critical or difficult tasks
Proactively seeks high-impact projects; steps up to challenges even when things are not going well
2. Results Orientation: Focuses on and drives toward delivering on goals, objectives, and performance improvement
No basis for judgment
Focuses on fulfilling activities at hand; unsure how work relates to goals
Takes actions to overcome obstacles to achieve goals
Independently acts to exceed goals and plans for contingencies
Documents activities and outcomes to learn from past; introduces incremental improvements to raise the effectiveness of team
Invents new approaches with measurably better results; works to deliver best-in-class performance improvements
Influence
3. Communication, Professional Impression & Poise: Delivers messages and ideas in a way that engages an audience and achieves buy-in; uses listening and other attending behaviors to reach shared understanding; remains calm and measured even in time of crisis or conflict
No basis for judgment
Struggles to get point across; neglects to understand audience’s input or perspective; lacks confidence and gets flustered under pressure
Works to get point across; acknowledges feedback; reframes statements when necessary to make them clearer; speaks politely; remains composed in known circumstances
Present views clearly and logically structures content for a broad audience; listens and responds to feedback; prepares in advance to appear confident; leaves a positive and professional impression; responds confidently in unfamiliar situations
Uses tailored language that appeals to specific groups; restates what others have said to check for understanding; comes across as confident; responds rapidly and strongly to crisis; looked to for advice and guidance
Structures content for senior-level meetings; maintains composure when challenged; solicits opinions and concerns, discusses them openly and adjusts communication; remains cool under pressure during conflict or crisis; channels emotion into positive action
4. Influence and Collaboration: Engages and works with people over whom one has no direct control
No basis for judgment
Does not seek input and perspective of others
Accepts input from others and engages them in problem solving
Seeks first to understand perspectives of others; takes actions to gain their support for ideas and initiatives
Uses tailored approaches to connect with others, influence, and achieve results
Uses tailored influence approaches to create and leverage a network of strategically chosen individuals to improve collective outcomes
People
5. Respect for Others: Acknowledges the value of others’ views and actions
No basis for judgment
Unwilling to acknowledge others’ points of view
Open to considering others’ views when confronted or offered
Invites input from others because of expressed respect for them and their views
Praises people publicly for their good actions; ensures that others’ opinions are heard before their own
Uses empathy and personal experience to resolve conflicts and foster mutual respect; reinforces respect with public praise when individuals solicit and use input from others
6. Team Leadership: Manages and empowers a team of formal or informal direct reports, including virtual teams
No basis for judgment
Struggles to delegate effectively (e.g. micromanages); does not organize activities or provide appropriate information to complete tasks
Assigns tasks and tells people what to do; checks when they are done
Solicits ideas and perspectives from the team; structures activities; holds members accountable
Actively engages the team to develop plans and resolve issues through collaboration; shows the impact of individual/team contributions
Recruits others into duties or roles based on insight into individual abilities; rewards those who exceed expectations; provides strong organizational support
7. Developing Others: Helps people develop their performance and ability over time
No basis for judgment
Focuses only on one’s own growth; critical of others’ efforts to develop
Encourages people to develop; points out mistakes to help people develop and praises them for improvements
Gives specific positive and negative behavioral feedback to support the development of others
Provides overarching practical guiding principles and recommendations that are applicable in multiple situations to direct or focus efforts on specific areas of development
Identifies potential in others; inspires others to develop by providing feedback, mentoring/coaching, and identifying new growth opportunities as well as supporting their effort to change
Personal Qualities
8. Trustworthiness/ Integrity: Acts consistently in line with or follows explicit values, beliefs or intentions
No basis for judgment
Follows the crowd; takes path of least resistance; gives in under pressure
Acts consistently with stated intentions, values, or beliefs when it is easy to do so
Acts spontaneously and consistently with stated intentions, values, or beliefs despite opposition
Initiates actions based on values or beliefs even though the actions may come with reputational risk; demonstrates the values of the team or organization publicly
Demonstrates high personal integrity even at personal cost; holds people accountable to the team or organizational values
9. Adaptability/ Resilience: Adapts to changing demands and circumstances without difficulty. Maintains calm optimism in the face of challenge, problems, or apparent failure
No basis for judgment
Prefers existing ways of doing things; fears failure; becomes anxious under challenging situations
Adapts to new methods and procedures when required to do so; remains calm in unfamiliar situations until confronted with obstacle
Champions adoption of new initiatives and processes; exhibits level-headedness in most environments including challenging ones; persists until obstacle is overcome
Seeks out disruptions as an opportunity for improvement; remains optimistic and forward-looking in difficult situations that may result in failure
Energized by projects with high uncertainty but potential for high reward; seeks to be the first into unknown or unfamiliar situations; welcomes learning opportunities created by failure; learns from mistakes and rebounds quickly from setbacks
10. Self Awareness: Aware of and seeks out additional input on own strengths and weaknesses
No basis for judgment
Lacks awareness of how he/she is perceived; denies or offers excuses when confronted
Acknowledges fault or performance problem when confronted with concrete example or data
Describes own key strengths and weaknesses accurately; welcomes feedback from others and discusses opportunities to change with select individuals
Actively seeks out feedback to explicitly address desired improvement areas or build on strengths; explores reasons for problems openly, including own faults
Seeks out challenging and potentially risky experiences to improve; identifies and engages with resources—people, processes, or content—to maximize strengths or mitigate weaknesses
Cognitive
11. Problem Solving: Frames problems, analyzes situations, identifies key issues, conducts analysis on the issues, and produces acceptable solution
No basis for judgment
Avoids problems; when faced with problems, sticks to what worked before, or chooses an obvious path
Offers solutions when the risk is low; focuses on immediate, short-term implications instead of the big picture
Looks beyond the obvious; identifies and focuses on the critical information needed to understand a problem, identifies root cause(s), and comes up with reasonable solutions
Gathers and analyzes key information using complex methods or several layers deep; integrates perspectives from a variety of sources to arrive at unexpected but practical and effective solutions
Applies logic to break complex problems down into manageable parts or sub-problems; solves tough and interconnected problems and can explain how the pieces are connected
12. Strategic Orientation: Thinks beyond one’s span of control and into the future to reshape the approach or scope of work
No basis for judgment
Focuses on completing work without understanding implications
Understands immediate issues or implications of work or analysis
Develops insights or recommendations within area of responsibility that have improved near-term business performance
Develops insights or recommendations within area of responsibility that have shaped team/organization strategy and will have impact on long-term business performance
Develops insights or recommendations beyond area of responsibility with impact on long-term business strategy and performance
Based on your professional experience, how do you rate this candidate compared to her/his peer group? (select)
Overall, I … (select)
Letter of Recommendation
Please write an assessment of the applicant that addresses the prompts below. We are looking for your candid and accurate assessment of the applicant's potential to be a successful leader and the specific traits the applicant possesses that evidence this potential. Please be as specific as possible and use concrete examples where applicable. Do not incorporate anything drafted by the candidate in your recommendation or have the candidate submit the recommendation on your behalf.
Please note that letters of recommendation must be written in English. If English is not your native language, rest assured that your applicant will not be at a disadvantage. We welcome you to write your letter in English regardless of your level of proficiency, or to write in your native language and use a translator or one of many free translation programs available. If you have used a translator or translation program, please indicate that above.
1. Please provide a brief description of your interaction with the applicant and, if applicable, the applicant's role in your organization. (Recommended word count: 50 words)
2. How does the performance of the applicant compare to that of other well-qualified individuals in similar roles? (E.g. what are the applicant's principal strengths?) (Recommended word count: 500 words)
3. Describe the most important piece of constructive feedback you have given the applicant. Please detail the circumstances and the applicant's response. (Recommended word count: 500 words)
4. Are you in a position to know whether the applicant is sponsored for the MBA by his or her current employer? If so, please comment.
5. (Optional) Is there anything else we should know?
Upload a PDF or Word document here.